Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37192767›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2023

Effectiveness of spironolactone for women with acne vulgaris (SAFA) in England and Wales: pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, double blind, randomised controlled trial.

Miriam Santer, Megan Lawrence, Susanne Renz, Zina Eminton, Beth Stuart, Tracey H Sach, Sarah Pyne, Matthew J Ridd, Nick Francis, Irene Soulsby and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Acne vulgaris: a clinical update.Australian prescriber · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Efficacy and Safety of Hormonal Therapies for Acne: A Narrative Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-5260
Megan LawrenceSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4776-0616
Susanne RenzSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-7240
Zina EmintonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0009-0001-2747-4279
Beth StuartPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5432-7437
Tracey H SachHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8098-9220
Sarah PyneHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0093-9125
Matthew J RiddPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-8823
Nick FrancisPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8939-7312
Irene SoulsbyPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2291-831X
Karen ThomasPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-3380
Natalia PermyakovaSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-3215
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-1873
Ingrid MullerPrimary Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9341-6133
Jacqui NuttallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-2594
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9579-8021
Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Applied Health Services Research Building, University Park, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7785-7465
Alison M LaytonSkin Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0473-3319
SAFA trial investigators
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of oral spironolactone for acne vulgaris in adult women.

designPragmatic, multicentre, phase 3, double blind, randomised controlled trial.

settingPrimary and secondary healthcare, and advertising in the community and on social media in England and Wales.

participantsWomen (≥18 years) with facial acne for at least six months, judged to warrant oral antibiotics.

interventionsParticipants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 50 mg/day spironolactone or matched placebo until week six, increasing to 100 mg/day spironolactone or placebo until week 24. Participants could continue using topical treatment.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) symptom subscale score at week 12 (range 0-30, where higher scores reflect improved QoL). Secondary outcomes were Acne-QoL at week 24, participant self-assessed improvement; investigator's global assessment (IGA) for treatment success; and adverse reactions.

resultsFrom 5 June 2019 to 31 August 2021, 1267 women were assessed for eligibility, 410 were randomly assigned to the intervention (n=201) or control group (n=209) and 342 were included in the primary analysis (n=176 in the intervention group and n=166 in the control group). Baseline mean age was 29.2 years (standard deviation 7.2), 28 (7%) of 389 were from ethnicities other than white, with 46% mild, 40% moderate, and 13% severe acne. Mean Acne-QoL symptom scores at baseline were 13.2 (standard deviation 4.9) and at week 12 were 19.2 (6.1) for spironolactone and 12.9 (4.5) and 17.8 (5.6) for placebo (difference favouring spironolactone 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 2.46), adjusted for baseline variables). Scores at week 24 were 21.2 (5.9) for spironolactone and 17.4 (5.8) for placebo (difference 3.45 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 4.75), adjusted). More participants in the spironolactone group reported acne improvement than in the placebo group: no significant difference was reported at week 12 (72%

conclusionsSpironolactone improved outcomes compared with placebo, with greater differences at week 24 than week 12. Spironolactone is a useful alternative to oral antibiotics for women with acne.

trial registrationISRCTN12892056.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisSpironolactoneAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeWalesAnti-Bacterial AgentsImmunoglobulin ASpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID37192767
PMCPMC10543374
OpenAlexW4376636540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.