Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37192764›Full record

ArticleBMJ military health2024

The

Claire Castle, H Engward, T Kersey, L Kirk-Partridge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ military health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Claire CastleSocial & Welfare Research, BRAVO VICTOR, London, UK claire.castle@bravovictor.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6643-0439
H EngwardVeterans and Families Institute for Military Social Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
T KerseyVeterans and Families Institute for Military Social Research, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
L Kirk-PartridgeBlind Veterans UK, London, UK.
Anglia Ruskin University · GBRoyal National Institute of Blind · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe clinical application of the arts among military personnel and veterans has been well documented, particularly in relation to service-related mental health difficulties. However, the impacts of engaging recreationally with art activities on general well-being remain underexplored and even more so among those living with visual impairment (VI). This pilot explored the artistic experiences of veterans with VI participating in a remotely delivered art and craft project during continued COVID-19 restrictions in Spring/Summer 2021.

methodsSix participants received a

resultsAnalysis identified 11 themes relating to initial and ongoing responses to the

conclusionThis pilot brings to the fore the everyday artistic experience of veterans living with VI and considers the benefits, challenges and well-being implications of a remotely delivered arts activity. Findings illustrate the importance of ensuring accessibility of artistic activities to those for whom disability might limit participation and highlight the ongoing role that remotely delivered arts activities might play in meeting the social and recreational needs of individuals beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Art TherapyCOVID-19Qualitative ResearchVeteransAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSARS-CoV-2United KingdomVision Disorderscomplementary medicinepublic healthqualitative researchsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID37192764
PMCPMC11137445
OpenAlexW4295022871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.