Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37192169›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Consistently estimating network statistics using aggregated relational data.

Emily Breza, Arun G Chandrasekhar, Shane Lubold, Tyler H McCormick, Mengjie Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Thirty Years of The Network Scale-up Method.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily BrezaDepartment of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Arun G ChandrasekharDepartment of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Shane LuboldDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Tyler H McCormickDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-1129
Mengjie PanDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.

Funding

Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURRAN, SARA R. · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Daniel T A Eisenberg · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
Big Data, Big Models, and Big Bias?: A decision making framework for vital rate estimates based on extrapolationDP2MH122405 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCORMICK, TYLER · 2019 to 2019
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH122405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collecting complete network data is expensive, time-consuming, and often infeasible. Aggregated Relational Data (ARD), which ask respondents questions of the form "How many people with trait X do you know?" provide a low-cost option when collecting complete network data is not possible. Rather than asking about connections between each pair of individuals directly, ARD collect the number of contacts the respondent knows with a given trait. Despite widespread use and a growing literature on ARD methodology, there is still no systematic understanding of when and why ARD should accurately recover features of the unobserved network. This paper provides such a characterization by deriving conditions under which statistics about the unobserved network (or functions of these statistics like regression coefficients) can be consistently estimated using ARD. We first provide consistent estimates of network model parameters for three commonly used probabilistic models: the beta-model with node-specific unobserved effects, the stochastic block model with unobserved community structure, and latent geometric space models with unobserved latent locations. A key observation is that cross-group link probabilities for a collection of (possibly unobserved) groups identify the model parameters, meaning ARD are sufficient for parameter estimation. With these estimated parameters, it is possible to simulate graphs from the fitted distribution and analyze the distribution of network statistics. We can then characterize conditions under which the simulated networks based on ARD will allow for consistent estimation of the unobserved network statistics, such as eigenvector centrality, or response functions by or of the unobserved network, such as regression coefficients.

Indexed as

aggregated relational dataconsistencysocial networkssurvey methods

Identifiers

PMID37192169
PMCPMC10214200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.