Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37192147›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Prevalence and impact of combined vision and hearing (dual sensory) impairment: A scoping review.

Tess Bright, Jacqueline Ramke, Justine H Zhang, Gatera Fiston Kitema, Sare Safi, Shaffi Mdala, Miho Yoshizaki, Christopher G Brennan-Jones, Islay Mactaggart, Iris Gordon and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Progress Through Engagement: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Community-Based Participatory Research in Vision Impairment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

Tess BrightIndigenous Health Equity Unit, Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2079-7216
Jacqueline RamkeInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Justine H ZhangInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-2003
Gatera Fiston KitemaOphthalmology Department, School of Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1623-9302
Sare SafiOphthalmic Epidemiology Research Center, Research Institute for Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shaffi MdalaOphthalmology Department, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-523X
Miho YoshizakiInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher G Brennan-JonesEar Health Group, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Islay MactaggartInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Iris GordonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Bonnielin K SwenorThe Johns Hopkins Disability Health Research Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6044-0951
Matthew J BurtonInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1872-9169
Jennifer R EvansInternational Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBJohns Hopkins University · USManchester Royal Eye Hospital · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital · MWQueen's University Belfast · GBShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Kigali · RW

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207472/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hearing and vision impairments are common globally. They are often considered separately in research, and in planning and delivering services. However, they can occur concurrently, termed dual sensory impairment (DSI). The prevalence and impact of hearing and vision impairment have been well-examined, but there has been much less consideration of DSI. The aim of this scoping review was to determine the nature and extent of the evidence on prevalence and impact of DSI. Three databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health (April 2022). We included primary studies and systematic reviews reporting the prevalence or impact of DSI. No limits were placed on age, publication dates, or country. Only studies where the full text was available in English were included. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstract, full texts. Data were charted by two reviewers independently using a pre-piloted form. The review identified 183 reports of 153 unique primary studies and 14 review articles. Most evidence came from high-income countries (86% of reports). Prevalence varied across reports, as did age groups of participants and definitions used. The prevalence of DSI increased with age. Impact was examined across three broad groups of outcomes-psychosocial, participation, and physical health. There was a strong trend towards poorer outcomes for people with DSI across all categories compared to people with one or neither impairment, including activities of daily living (worse for people with DSI in 78% of reports) and depression (68%). This scoping review highlights that DSI is a relatively common condition with substantial impact, particularly among older adults. There is a gap in evidence from low and middle-income countries. There is a pressing need for a consensus position on the definition(s) of DSI and standardisation of reporting age groups to enable reliable estimates to be ascertained and compared and responsive services developed.

Identifiers

PMID37192147
PMCPMC10187940
OpenAlexW4376872062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.