Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191912›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Postoperative course of cerebrospinal fluid diversion in the setting of leptomeningeal disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression with an illustrative case.

Victor M Lu, Hussam Abou-Al-Shaar, Othman Bin-Alamer, Evan M Luther, Carolina G Benjamin

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Victor M LuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, US. victor.lu@jhsmiami.org.
Hussam Abou-Al-ShaarDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, US.
Othman Bin-AlamerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, US.
Evan M LutherDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, US.
Carolina G BenjaminDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, US.
University of Miami · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of hydrocephalus symptoms in the setting of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) includes cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion, which can in the form of ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS) and lumboperitoneal shunting (LPS). However, the quantifiable postoperative course following this intervention is poorly defined. Correspondingly the aim of our study was to quantitatively define and analyze the pooled metadata regarding this topic.

methodsMultiple electronic databases from inception to March 2023 were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Respective cohort-level outcomes were then abstracted and pooled by means of meta-analyses and analyzed by means meta-regression, both utilizing random-effects modeling. Post-hoc bias evaluation was then performed for all outcomes.

resultsA total of 12 studies were identified for inclusion, describing 503 LMD patients managed by CSF diversion - 442 (88%) by VPS and 61 (12%) by LPS. Median male percentage and age at diversion were 32% and 58 years respectively, with lung and breast cancer the most common primary diagnoses. Meta-analysis demonstrated pooled incidence of symptom resolution in 79% (95% CI 68-88%) of patients after index shunt surgery, and shunt revision required in 10% (95% CI 6-15%) of cases. Pooled overall survival from index shunt surgery was 3.8 mo (95% CI 2.9-4.6 mo) across all studies. Meta-regression demonstrated that studies published later trended towards significantly shorter overall survival from index shunt surgery (co-efficient=-0.38, P = 0.023), whereas the proportion of VPS to LPS in each study did not impact survival (P = 0.89). When accounting for these biases, overall survival from index shunt surgery was re-estimated to be shorter 3.1 mo (95% CI 1.7-4.4 mo). We present an illustrative case demonstrating the course of symptom improvement, shunt revision and an overall survival of 2 weeks from index CSF diversion.

conclusionAlthough CSF diversion in the setting of LMD can improve hydrocephalus symptoms in the majority of patients, there is a non-negligible proportion that will require shunt revision. Postoperatively, the prognosis of LMD remains poor irrespective of shunt type, and despite possible biases within the current literature, the expected median overall survival after index surgery is a matter of months. These findings support CSF diversion as an effective palliative procedure when considering symptoms and quality of life. Further research is required to understand how postoperative expectations can be managed to respect the best wishes of patients, their family, and the treating clinical team.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsHydrocephalusHumansLipopolysaccharidesMaleQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesVentriculoperitoneal ShuntLipopolysaccharidesLeptomeningeal disease; carcinomatosisLPSLumboperitonealShuntSurvivalVentriculoperitonealVPS

Identifiers

PMID37191912
OpenAlexW4376642172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.