Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191859›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Association of Sarcopenia with a Poor Prognosis and Decreased Tumor-Infiltrating CD8-Positive T Cells in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis.

Shigeto Masuda, Kohei Yamakawa, Atsuhiro Masuda, Hirochika Toyama, Keitaro Sofue, Yoshihide Nanno, Shohei Komatsu, Satoshi Omiya, Arata Sakai, Takashi Kobayashi and 17 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Prognostic relevance of sarcopenia and tumor-infiltrating CD8Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Pancreatic cancer and sarcopenia: a narrative review of the current status.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shigeto Masuda *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Kohei Yamakawa *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Atsuhiro MasudaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. atmasuda@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
Hirochika ToyamaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Keitaro SofueDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Yoshihide NannoDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Shohei KomatsuDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Satoshi OmiyaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Arata SakaiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Takeshi TanakaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masahiro TsujimaeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Shigeto AshinaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Masanori GondaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Shohei AbeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Hisahiro UemuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Shinya KohashiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Noriko InomataDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Kae NagaoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Yoshiyuki HaradaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Mika MikiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Yosuke IrieDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Noriko JuriDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Maki KanzawaDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Tomoo ItohDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Takumi FukumotoDepartment of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Yuzo KodamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19K08444Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H03058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia, defined as a loss of skeletal muscle mass and quality, is found in 30-65% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at diagnosis, and is a poor prognostic factor. However, it is yet to be evaluated why sarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, this study elucidated the tumor characteristics of PDAC with sarcopenia, including driver gene alterations and tumor microenvironment. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 162 patients with PDAC who underwent pancreatic surgery between 2008 and 2017. We defined sarcopenia by measuring the skeletal muscle mass at the L3 level using preoperative computed tomography images and evaluated driver gene alteration (KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A/p16, and SMAD4) and tumor immune (CD4

resultsIn localized-stage PDAC (stage ≤ IIa), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were significantly shorter in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group (2-year OS 89.7% versus 59.1%, P = 0.03; 2-year RFS 74.9% versus 50.0%, P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia was an independent poor prognostic factor in localized-stage PDAC. Additionally, tumor-infiltrating CD8

conclusionsSarcopenia was associated with a worse prognosis and decreased tumor-infiltrating CD8

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMuscle, SkeletalPancreatic NeoplasmsSarcopeniaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisImmune cellsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaSarcopeniaSkeletal muscle indexTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID37191859
PMCPMC10409680
OpenAlexW4376641745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.