ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Integration of Metabolomic and Proteomic Data to Uncover Actionable Metabolic Pathways.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding epithelial-mesenchymal transitions with multi-omics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- PathBank 2.0-the pathway database for model organism metabolomics.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Engineered microbial consortia for next-generation feedstocks.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) is an important tool for biological studies because it is capable of interrogating a diversity of biomolecules (proteins, drugs, metabolites) not captured via alternate genomic platforms. Unfortunately, downstream data analysis becomes complicated when attempting to evaluate and integrate measurements of different molecular classes and requires the aggregation of expertise from different relevant disciplines. This complexity represents a significant bottleneck that limits the routine deployment of MS-based multi-omic methods, despite the unmatched biological and functional insight the data can provide. To address this unmet need, our group introduced Omics Notebook as an open-source framework for facilitating exploratory analysis, reporting and integrating MS-based multi-omic data in a way that is automated, reproducible and customizable. By deploying this pipeline, we have devised a framework for researchers to more rapidly identify functional patterns across complex data types and focus on statistically significant and biologically interesting aspects of their multi-omic profiling experiments. This chapter aims to describe a protocol which leverages our publicly accessible tools to analyze and integrate data from high-throughput proteomics and metabolomics experiments and produce reports that will facilitate more impactful research, cross-institutional collaborations, and wider data dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37191795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.