Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191660›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Quantification of impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cancer screening programmes - a case study from Argentina, Bangladesh, Colombia, Morocco, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.

Eric Lucas, Raul Murillo, Silvina Arrossi, Martin Bárcena, Youssef Chami, Ashrafun Nessa, Suraj Perera, Padmaka Silva, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Richard Muwonge and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Implementation of second round of HPV-based screening for cervical cancer in programmatic contexts in Argentina.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Cervical cancer in Thailand: 2023 update.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Disparities in Gynecologic Cancers.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eric LucasInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1252-1925
Raul MurilloHospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7187-9946
Silvina ArrossiInvestigadora CEDES/CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martin BárcenaInstituto Provincial del Cáncer, Jujuy, Argentina.
Youssef ChamiFoundation Lalla Salma Cancer prevention and treatment, Rabat, Morocco.
Ashrafun NessaBangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Suraj PereraMinistry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Padmaka SilvaMinistry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Suleeporn SangrajrangNational Cancer Institute of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.
Richard MuwongeInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Partha BasuInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0124-4050

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is quite well documented that the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer screening services in all countries, irrespective of their resources and healthcare settings. While quantitative estimates on reduction in volume of screening tests or diagnostic evaluation are readily available from the high-income countries, very little data are available from the low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). From the CanScreen5 global cancer screening data repository we identified six LMICs through purposive sampling based on the availability of cancer screening data at least for the years 2019 and 2020. These countries represented those in high human development index (HDI) categories (Argentina, Colombia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand) and medium HDI categories (Bangladesh and Morocco). No data were available from low HDI countries to perform similar analysis. The reduction in the volume of tests in 2020 compared to the previous year ranged from 14.1% in Bangladesh to 72.9% in Argentina (regional programme) for cervical screening, from 14.2% in Bangladesh to 49.4% in Morocco for breast cancer screening and 30.7% in Thailand for colorectal cancer screening. Number of colposcopies was reduced in 2020 compared to previous year by 88.9% in Argentina, 38.2% in Colombia, 27.4% in Bangladesh, and 52.2% in Morocco. The reduction in detection rates of CIN 2 or worse lesions ranged from 20.7% in Morocco to 45.4% in Argentina. Reduction of breast cancer detection by 19.1% was reported from Morocco. No association of the impact of pandemic could be seen with HDI categories. Quantifying the impact of service disruptions in screening and diagnostic tests will allow the programmes to strategize how to ramp up services to clear the backlogs in screening and more crucially in further evaluation of screen positives. The data can be used to estimate the impact on stage distribution and avoidable mortality from these common cancers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsArgentinaBangladeshColombiaDeveloping CountriesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMoroccoPandemicsSri LankaThailandcancer screeningCOVID-19epidemiologyglobal healthimpactlow- and middle-income countriesnone

Identifiers

PMID37191660
PMCPMC10188105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.