ArticleCurrent protocols2023
Measuring Motivation Using the Progressive Ratio Task in Adolescent Mice.
Article in Current protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The neural basis of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Alterations in reward seeking are a hallmark of multiple psychiatric disorders, including substance abuse and depression. One important aspect of reward seeking is 'wanting', which can be operationalized in both humans and rodents in tasks such as the progressive ratio, in which an increasing amount of work is required to earn a given reward. Importantly, many disorders with reward-seeking deficits are believed to have an important neurodevelopmental component, underscoring the importance of being able to study changes in motivation across the lifespan. Although this task has been adapted for both adult and adolescent rats, in mice it has predominantly been used to assay motivational changes in adults. Specific concerns in adapting this task from adult to adolescent mice include (1) optimizing a food restriction paradigm suitable for growing animals whose weights are naturally dynamically changing and (2) identifying task conditions that allow younger, smaller mice to perform the task while minimizing the length of the behavioral shaping required to measure motivation at specific developmental dates. Toward that end, we now report a protocol for appropriate weight management in developing animals that require food restriction, and a protocol for behavioral shaping and progressive ratio testing in adolescent mice, including an assessment of whether the animals perform better with lever presses or nose pokes as the required operant response. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Food restriction and weight management in the context of developing mice Alternate Protocol: Food restriction and weight management of developing mice without projected growth chart: Utilization of baseline mice Basic Protocol 2: Operant box design, progressive ratio training, testing, and data analysis in adolescent mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.