Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191309›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Interleaved signal multiplexing readout in depth encoding Prism-PET detectors.

Yixin Li, Andy LaBella, Xinjie Zeng, Zipai Wang, Eric Petersen, Xinjie Cao, Wei Zhao, Amir H Goldan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yixin LiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Andy LaBellaDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Xinjie ZengDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Zipai WangDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Eric PetersenDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.
Xinjie CaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Wei ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Amir H GoldanDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

Prism-PET: A TOF-DOI-Compton PET detector technology for total-body PET imagingR01EB030413 · NIBIB · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GOLDAN, AMIRHOSSEIN · 2021 to 2024
$2.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven the large number of readout pixels in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners, signal multiplexing is an indispensable feature to reduce scanner complexity, power consumption, heat output, and cost. PURPOSE: In this paper, we introduce interleaved multiplexing (iMux) scheme that utilizes the characteristic light-sharing pattern of depth-encoding Prism-PET detector modules with single-ended readout.

methodsIn the iMux readout, four anodes from every other silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) pixels across rows and columns, which overlap with four distinct light guides, are connected to the same application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) channel. The 4-to-1 coupled Prism-PET detector module was used which consisted of a 16 ×  16 array of 1.5 × 1.5 × 20 mm

resultsThe measured flood histograms, using the decoded energy signals from our deep learning-based demultiplexing architecture, achieved perfect crystal identification of events with negligible decoding error. The average energy, DOI, and timing resolutions were 9.6 ± 1.5%, 2.9 ± 0.9 mm, and 266 ± 19 ps for non-multiplexed readout and 10.3 ± 1.6%, 2.8 ± 0.8 mm, and 311 ± 28 ps for multiplexed readout, respectively.

conclusionsOur proposed iMux scheme improves on the already cost-effective and high-resolution Prism-PET detector module and provides 16-to-1 crystal-to-readout multiplexing without appreciable performance degradation. Also, only four SiPM pixels are shorted together in the 8 ×  8 array to achieve 4-to-1 pixel-to-readout multiplexing, resulting in lower capacitance per multiplexed channel.

Indexed as

LutetiumPositron-Emission TomographyElectrodesSilicatesLutetiumlutetium orthosilicateSilicatesdeep learningdemultiplexingPrism-PETsignal multiplexing

Identifiers

PMID37191309
PMCPMC11057968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.