Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191292›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Are single-peaked tuning curves tuned for speed rather than accuracy?

Movitz Lenninger, Mikael Skoglund, Pawel Andrzej Herman, Arvind Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Movitz LenningerDivision of Information Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-4900
Mikael SkoglundDivision of Information Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pawel Andrzej HermanDivision of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6553-823X
Arvind KumarDivision of Computational Science and Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-9195

Funding

Institute of Advanced Studies Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to the efficient coding hypothesis, sensory neurons are adapted to provide maximal information about the environment, given some biophysical constraints. In early visual areas, stimulus-induced modulations of neural activity (or tunings) are predominantly single-peaked. However, periodic tuning, as exhibited by grid cells, has been linked to a significant increase in decoding performance. Does this imply that the tuning curves in early visual areas are sub-optimal? We argue that the time scale at which neurons encode information is imperative to understand the advantages of single-peaked and periodic tuning curves, respectively. Here, we show that the possibility of catastrophic (large) errors creates a trade-off between decoding time and decoding ability. We investigate how decoding time and stimulus dimensionality affect the optimal shape of tuning curves for removing catastrophic errors. In particular, we focus on the spatial periods of the tuning curves for a class of circular tuning curves. We show an overall trend for minimal decoding time to increase with increasing Fisher information, implying a trade-off between accuracy and speed. This trade-off is reinforced whenever the stimulus dimensionality is high, or there is ongoing activity. Thus, given constraints on processing speed, we present normative arguments for the existence of the single-peaked tuning organization observed in early visual areas.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSensory Receptor CellsProcessing Speeddecoding timehigh-dimensional stimulineural codingneurosciencenonespiking activitytuning curves

Identifiers

PMID37191292
PMCPMC10259479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.