Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37191200›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2023

Modes-of-action of antifungal compounds: Stressors and (target-site-specific) toxins, toxicants, or toxin-stressors.

Delphine Noel, John E Hallsworth, Eric Gelhaye, Sylvain Darnet, Rodnay Sormani, Mélanie Morel-Rouhier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plant signaling & behavior · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Scientific novelty beyond the experiment.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Delphine NoelUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.ORCID 0009-0000-7266-0217
John E HallsworthInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6797-9362
Eric GelhayeUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0699-9113
Sylvain DarnetUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6351-0903
Rodnay SormaniUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0939-8639
Mélanie Morel-RouhierUniversité de Lorraine, INRAE, IAM, Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5149-0474
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRQueen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungi and antifungal compounds are relevant to the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. However, the modes-of-action of antifungals-whether they are naturally occurring substances or anthropogenic fungicides-are often unknown or are misallocated in terms of their mechanistic category. Here, we consider the most effective approaches to identifying whether antifungal substances are cellular stressors, toxins/toxicants (that are target-site-specific), or have a hybrid mode-of-action as toxin-stressors (that induce cellular stress yet are target-site-specific). This newly described 'toxin-stressor' category includes some photosensitisers that target the cell membrane and, once activated by light or ultraviolet radiation, cause oxidative damage. We provide a glossary of terms and a diagrammatic representation of diverse types of stressors, toxic substances, and toxin-stressors, a classification that is pertinent to inhibitory substances not only for fungi but for all types of cellular life. A decision-tree approach can also be used to help differentiate toxic substances from cellular stressors (Curr Opin Biotechnol 2015 33: 228-259). For compounds that target specific sites in the cell, we evaluate the relative merits of using metabolite analyses, chemical genetics, chemoproteomics, transcriptomics, and the target-based drug-discovery approach (based on that used in pharmaceutical research), focusing on both ascomycete models and the less-studied basidiomycete fungi. Chemical genetic methods to elucidate modes-of-action currently have limited application for fungi where molecular tools are not yet available; we discuss ways to circumvent this bottleneck. We also discuss ecologically commonplace scenarios in which multiple substances act to limit the functionality of the fungal cell and a number of as-yet-unresolved questions about the modes-of-action of antifungal compounds pertaining to the Sustainable Development Goals.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsUltraviolet RaysFungiOxidative StressAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID37191200
PMCPMC10281380
OpenAlexW4376640914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.