Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190873›Full record

ReviewDevelopment, growth & differentiation2023

Mathematical modeling for developmental processes.

Yoh Iwasa

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development, growth & differentiation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mathematical modeling for developmental processes.Development, growth & differentiation · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yoh IwasaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0691-1852
Nagano University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review several mathematical models and concepts in developmental biology that have been established over the last decade. (1) Feedback vertex set: Ascidian embryos contain cells of seven types, and cell fate is controlled by ~100 interacting genes. The "feedback vertex set" of the directed graph of the gene regulatory network consists of a small number of genes. By experimentally manipulating them, we can differentiate cells into any cell type. (2) Tissue deformation: Describing morphological changes in tissues and relating them to gene expression and other cellular processes is key in understanding morphogenesis. Expansion and anisotropy of the tissue are described by a "deformation tensor" at each location. A study on chick limb bud formation revealed that both the volume growth rate and anisotropy in deformation differed significantly between locations and stages. (3) Mechanobiology: Forces operating on each cell may alter cell shape and gene expression, which may subsequently exert forces on their surroundings. Measurements of force, tissue shape, and gene expression help us understand autonomous tissue deformation. (4) Adaptive design of development: An optimal growth schedule in fluctuating environments explains the growth response to starvation in Drosophila larvae. Adaptive placement of morphogen sources makes development robust to noises.

Indexed as

DrosophilaOrganogenesisAnimalsCell DifferentiationModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisdeformation tensorfeedback vertex setforcesgene regulatory networkoptimal control

Identifiers

PMID37190873
PMCPMC11520983
OpenAlexW4376641711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.