Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190830›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2023

[Study on the evaluation of glenoid bone defects by MRI three-dimensional reconstruction].

Fei Zhang, Lin Xu, Baoxiang Zhang, Shoulong Song, Xianhao Sheng, Wentao Xiong, Ziran Wang, Weixiong Liao, Qiang Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fei ZhangChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Lin XuDepartment of Radiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Baoxiang ZhangChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Shoulong SongChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Xianhao ShengChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Wentao XiongChinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Ziran WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, the 903rd Hospital of Chinese PLA, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310013, P. R. China.
Weixiong LiaoDepartment of Emergency, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Qiang ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, P. R. China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of MRI three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction model in quantifying glenoid bone defect by comparing with CT 3D reconstruction model measurement. Methods: Forty patients with shoulder anterior dislocation who met the selection criteria between December 2021 and December 2022 were admitted as study participants. There were 34 males and 6 females with an average age of 24.8 years (range, 19-32 years). The injury caused by sports injury in 29 cases and collision injury in 6 cases, and 5 cases had no obvious inducement. The time from injury to admission ranged from 4 to 72 months (mean, 28.5 months). CT and MRI were performed on the patients' shoulder joints, and a semi-automatic segmentation of the images was done with 3D slicer software to construct a glenoid model. The length of the glenoid bone defect was measured on the models by 2 physicians. The intra-group correlation coefficient ( Results: The length of the glenoid bone defects measured on MRI 3D reconstruction model was (3.83±1.36) mm/4.00 (0.58, 6.13) mm for physician 1 and (3.91±1.20) mm/3.86 (1.39, 5.96) mm for physician 2. The length of the glenoid bone defects measured on CT 3D reconstruction model was (3.81±1.38) mm/3.80 (0.60, 6.02) mm for physician 1 and (3.99±1.19) mm/4.00 (1.68, 6.38) mm for physician 2. Conclusion: The measurement of glenoid bone defect based on MRI 3D reconstruction model is consistent with that based on CT 3D reconstruction model. MRI can be used instead of CT to measure glenoid bone defects in clinic, and the soft tissue of shoulder joint can be observed comprehensively while reducing radiation.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityShoulder DislocationShoulder JointAdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung AdultCT three-dimensional reconstructionglenoid bone defectMRI three-dimensional reconstructionShoulder dislocation

Identifiers

PMID37190830
PMCPMC10196978
OpenAlexW4376641669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.