Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190738›Full record

ArticleHealthcare informatics research2023

Automatic Method for Optic Disc Segmentation Using Deep Learning on Retinal Fundus Images.

Anindita Septiarini, Hamdani Hamdani, Emy Setyaningsih, Eko Junirianto, Fitri Utaminingrum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anindita SeptiariniDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Hamdani HamdaniDepartment of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Emy SetyaningsihDepartment of Computer, System Engineering, Institut Sains & Teknologi AKPRIND, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Eko JuniriantoDepartmen of Information Technology, Samarinda Polytechnic of Agriculture, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Fitri UtaminingrumComputer Vision Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Brawijaya University, Malang, Indonesia.

Funding

KEMENDIKBUD RISTEK Indonesia 594/UN17.l1/PG/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe optic disc is part of the retinal fundus image structure, which influences the extraction of glaucoma features. This study proposes a method that automatically segments the optic disc area in retinal fundus images using deep learning based on a convolutional neural network (CNN).

methodsThis study used private and public datasets containing retinal fundus images. The private dataset consisted of 350 images, while the public dataset was the Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge (REFUGE). The proposed method was based on a CNN with a single-shot multibox detector (MobileNetV2) to form images of the region-of-interest (ROI) using the original image resized into 640 × 640 input data. A pre-processing sequence was then implemented, including augmentation, resizing, and normalization. Furthermore, a U-Net model was applied for optic disc segmentation with 128 × 128 input data.

resultsThe proposed method was appropriately applied to the datasets used, as shown by the values of the F1-score, dice score, and intersection over union of 0.9880, 0.9852, and 0.9763 for the private dataset, respectively, and 0.9854, 0.9838 and 0.9712 for the REFUGE dataset.

conclusionsThe optic disc area produced by the proposed method was similar to that identified by an ophthalmologist. Therefore, this method can be considered for implementing automatic segmentation of the optic disc area.

Indexed as

Computer VisionFundusGlaucomaImage ProcessingOptic Neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID37190738
PMCPMC10209731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.