Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190650›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Emotion Recognition from Spatio-Temporal Representation of EEG Signals via 3D-CNN with Ensemble Learning Techniques.

Rajamanickam Yuvaraj, Arapan Baranwal, A Amalin Prince, M Murugappan, Javeed Shaikh Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rajamanickam YuvarajNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore.
Arapan BaranwalDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, BITS Pilani, Sancoale 403726, Goa, India.
A Amalin PrinceDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, BITS Pilani, Sancoale 403726, Goa, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-9979
M MurugappanIntelligent Signal Processing (ISP) Research Lab, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Kuwait College of Science and Technology, Block 4, Doha 13133, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-4589
Javeed Shaikh MohammedDepartment of Biomedical Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-3101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recognition of emotions is one of the most challenging issues in human-computer interaction (HCI). EEG signals are widely adopted as a method for recognizing emotions because of their ease of acquisition, mobility, and convenience. Deep neural networks (DNN) have provided excellent results in emotion recognition studies. Most studies, however, use other methods to extract handcrafted features, such as Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), Principal Component Analysis, Higuchi Fractal Dimension (HFD), etc., even though DNN is capable of generating meaningful features. Furthermore, most earlier studies largely ignored spatial information between the different channels, focusing mainly on time domain and frequency domain representations. This study utilizes a pre-trained 3D-CNN MobileNet model with transfer learning on the spatio-temporal representation of EEG signals to extract features for emotion recognition. In addition to fully connected layers, hybrid models were explored using other decision layers such as multilayer perceptron (MLP), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), XGBoost (XGB), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM). Additionally, this study investigates the effects of post-processing or filtering output labels. Extensive experiments were conducted on the SJTU Emotion EEG Dataset (SEED) (three classes) and SEED-IV (four classes) datasets, and the results obtained were comparable to the state-of-the-art. Based on the conventional 3D-CNN with ELM classifier, SEED and SEED-IV datasets showed a maximum accuracy of 89.18% and 81.60%, respectively. Post-filtering improved the emotional classification performance in the hybrid 3D-CNN with ELM model for SEED and SEED-IV datasets to 90.85% and 83.71%, respectively. Accordingly, spatial-temporal features extracted from the EEG, along with ensemble classifiers, were found to be the most effective in recognizing emotions compared to state-of-the-art methods.

Indexed as

3D-CNNdeep neural networksemotion recognitionhybrid modelsmachine learning classifiers

Identifiers

PMID37190650
PMCPMC10136603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.