Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190625›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2023

The Use of Neurofeedback in Sports Training: Systematic Review.

Łukasz Rydzik, Wojciech Wąsacz, Tadeusz Ambroży, Norollah Javdaneh, Karolina Brydak, Marta Kopańska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Neurofeedback: Applications, advancements, and future directions.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Alpha Neurofeedback Training in Elite Soccer Players Trained in Groups.Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Łukasz RydzikInstitute of Sports Sciences, University of Physical Education, 31-571 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7956-7488
Wojciech WąsaczInstitute of Sports Sciences, University of Physical Education, 31-571 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7392-5229
Tadeusz AmbrożyInstitute of Sports Sciences, University of Physical Education, 31-571 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7361-9478
Norollah JavdanehDepartment of Biomechanics and Sports Injuries, Kharazmi University of Tehran, Tehran 14911-15719, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-9745
Karolina BrydakStudent Science Club "Reh-Tech", Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.
Marta KopańskaDepartment of Pathophysiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical College of Rzeszów University, 35-959 Rzeszow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3936-0698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofeedback training is a method commonly used in various fields of life, for example, in medicine, sports training or business. In recent studies, it has been shown that biofeedback, and neurofeedback, can affect the performance of professional athletes. Training based on the neurofeedback method includes exercising the brain waves. The aim of the article is to evaluate the influence of neurofeedback training on the physical fitness of professional athletes representing various sports disciplines, such as judo, volleyball and soccer. Based on 10 scientific papers from various sources, including PubMed, the latest research on neurofeedback and its impact on athletes has been reviewed. On the basis of the literature review from 2012 to 2022 on the neurofeedback method in sports training, it can be stated that this type of practice has a significant impact on physical fitness and sports performance. This review comprised 10 research studies with 491 participants in the neurofeedback groups, and 62 participants in the control group. Two reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated the quality of the studies utilising the PEDro scale. Properly planned and conducted neurofeedback training affects stimulation and improvement of many variables (reducing stress levels, increasing the ability to self-control physiological factors, enhancing behavioural efficiency and meliorating the speed of reaction to a stimulus).

Indexed as

biofeedbackneurofeedbackperformancesporttraining

Identifiers

PMID37190625
PMCPMC10136619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.