ArticleBrain sciences2023
Brain Tumor Segmentation Network with Multi-View Ensemble Discrimination and Kernel-Sharing Dilated Convolution.
Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain tumor segmentation using dual-stream multiscale 3D-UNET with dense net and spatial attention.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- [Research progress of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging brain tumor segmentation based on fused neural network model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- A Review of U-Net Based Deep Learning Frameworks for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Research progress on quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging reconstruction method based on improved U-network model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of brain tumors from magnetic resonance 3D images (MRI) is critical for clinical decisions and surgical planning. Radiologists usually separate and analyze brain tumors by combining images of axial, coronal, and sagittal views. However, traditional convolutional neural network (CNN) models tend to use information from only a single view or one by one. Moreover, the existing models adopt a multi-branch structure with different-size convolution kernels in parallel to adapt to various tumor sizes. However, the difference in the convolution kernels' parameters cannot precisely characterize the feature similarity of tumor lesion regions with various sizes, connectivity, and convexity. To address the above problems, we propose a hierarchical multi-view convolution method that decouples the standard 3D convolution into axial, coronal, and sagittal views to provide complementary-view features. Then, every pixel is classified by ensembling the discriminant results from the three views. Moreover, we propose a multi-branch kernel-sharing mechanism with a dilated rate to obtain parameter-consistent convolution kernels with different receptive fields. We use the BraTS2018 and BraTS2020 datasets for comparison experiments. The average Dice coefficients of the proposed network on the BraTS2020 dataset can reach 78.16%, 89.52%, and 83.05% for the enhancing tumor (ET), whole tumor (WT), and tumor core (TC), respectively, while the number of parameters is only 0.5 M. Compared with the baseline network for brain tumor segmentation, the accuracy was improved by 1.74%, 0.5%, and 2.19%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.