Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190567›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Automated Classification of Brain Tumors from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning.

Zahid Rasheed, Yong-Kui Ma, Inam Ullah, Tamara Al Shloul, Ahsan Bin Tufail, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, Muhammad Zubair Khan, Heba G Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahid RasheedSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Yong-Kui MaSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Inam UllahDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5879-569X
Tamara Al ShloulDepartment of General Education, Liwa College of Technology, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 41009, United Arab Emirates.
Ahsan Bin TufailDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Science and Technology, Balochistan Campus, Quetta 87300, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1371-7647
Yazeed Yasin GhadiDepartment of Computer Science, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 112612, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-495X
Muhammad Zubair KhanFaculty of Basic Sciences, BUITEMS, Quetta 87300, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-1566-2555
Heba G MohamedDepartment of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0443-1049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor classification is crucial for medical evaluation in computer-assisted diagnostics (CAD). However, manual diagnosis of brain tumors from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be time-consuming and complex, leading to inaccurate detection and classification. This is mainly because brain tumor identification is a complex procedure that relies on different modules. The advancements in Deep Learning (DL) have assisted in the automated process of medical images and diagnostics for various medical conditions, which benefits the health sector. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is one of the most prominent DL methods for visual learning and image classification tasks. This study presents a novel CNN algorithm to classify the brain tumor types of glioma, meningioma, and pituitary. The algorithm was tested on benchmarked data and compared with the existing pre-trained VGG16, VGG19, ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and InceptionV3 algorithms reported in the literature. The experimental results have indicated a high classification accuracy of 98.04%, precision, recall, and f1-score success rate of 98%, respectively. The classification results proved that the most common kinds of brain tumors could be categorized with a high level of accuracy. The presented algorithm has good generalization capability and execution speed that can be helpful in the field of medicine to assist doctors in making prompt and accurate decisions associated with brain tumor diagnosis.

Indexed as

brain tumorsDeep Learninghealthcaremagnetic resonance imagingneural networkpre-trained modelstumor classification

Identifiers

PMID37190567
PMCPMC10137171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.