ArticleBrain sciences2023
Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis Using Laplacian Score, Gaussian Process Regression and Self-Organizing Maps.
Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex degenerative brain disease that affects nerve cells in the brain responsible for body movement. Machine learning is widely used to track the progression of PD in its early stages by predicting unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) scores. In this paper, we aim to develop a new method for PD diagnosis with the aid of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques. Our method is developed using the Laplacian score, Gaussian process regression (GPR) and self-organizing maps (SOM). SOM is used to segment the data to handle large PD datasets. The models are then constructed using GPR for the prediction of the UPDRS scores. To select the important features in the PD dataset, we use the Laplacian score in the method. We evaluate the developed approach on a PD dataset including a set of speech signals. The method was evaluated through root-mean-square error (RMSE) and adjusted R-squared (adjusted R²). Our findings reveal that the proposed method is efficient in the prediction of UPDRS scores through a set of speech signals (dysphonia measures). The method evaluation showed that SOM combined with the Laplacian score and Gaussian process regression with the exponential kernel provides the best results for R-squared (Motor-UPDRS = 0.9489; Total-UPDRS = 0.9516) and RMSE (Motor-UPDRS = 0.5144; Total-UPDRS = 0.5105) in predicting UPDRS compared with the other kernels in Gaussian process regression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.