ReviewBrain sciences2023
Outcome Comparison of Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia Surgical Treatments-An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews.
Review in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Psychological assessment in patients affected by trigeminal neuralgia. A systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Characteristics and Early Pain Outcomes After Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Pivotal Factors for Minimizing the Risks of Therapeutic Failure in Trigeminal Neuralgia and Hemifacial Spasm.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Electrophysiological monitoring of trigeminal nerve sensory root using sensory-masseter response for microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- Surgical Outcomes Following Distal Nerve Decompression in Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Patient satisfaction and pain relief following radiofrequency rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Retreatment predictors after percutaneous balloon gangliolysis for trigeminal neuralgia.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Trigeminal neuralgia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
- Unlocking relief: the revolutionizing potential of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Trigeminal neuralgia caused by venous compression: a comprehensive literature review.Journal of medicine and life · 2024Review
- Article
- Radiofrequency thermocoagulation for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia associated with a focal pontine lesion: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2023Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in the management of trigeminal neuralgia.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- The importance of pre-operative neuroanatomical study in the surgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia associated with multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is not always a feasible option due to a lack of full response or adverse effects. Open surgery or percutaneous procedures are advocated in these cases. Several articles have compared the results among different techniques. Nevertheless, the findings of these studies are heterogeneous. Umbrella reviews are studies sitting at the peak of the evidence pyramid. With this umbrella review, we provided a systematic review of the outcomes of the surgical procedures used for TN treatment. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included following the PRISMA guidelines. Ten articles were enrolled for qualitative and quantitative assessment. Level of evidence was quantified using a specific tool (AMSTAR-2). Results were heterogenous in terms of outcome and measurements. Microvascular decompression (MVD) appeared to be the most effective procedure both in the short-term (pain relief in 85-96.6% of cases) and long-term follow-up (pain relief in 64-79% of cases), although showed the highest rate of complications. The results of percutaneous techniques were similar but radiosurgery showed the highest variation in term of pain relief and a higher rate of delayed responses. The use of the AMSTAR-2 tool to quantify the evidence level scored three studies as critically low and seven studies as low-level, revealing a lack of good quality studies on this topic. Our umbrella review evidenced the need of well-designed comparative studies and the utilization of validated scales in order to provide more homogenous data for pooled-analyses and meta-analyses in the field of TN surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.