ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Two-Stage Voting-Boosting Technique for Ensemble Learning in Social Network Sentiment Classification.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Hypertension: An Ensemble Modeling Approach.Healthcare informatics research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, social network sentiment classification has been extensively researched and applied in various fields, such as opinion monitoring, market analysis, and commodity feedback. The ensemble approach has achieved remarkable results in sentiment classification tasks due to its superior performance. The primary reason behind the success of ensemble methods is the enhanced diversity of the base classifiers. The boosting method employs a sequential ensemble structure to construct diverse data while also utilizing erroneous data by assigning higher weights to misclassified samples in the next training round. However, this method tends to use a sequential ensemble structure, resulting in a long computation time. Conversely, the voting method employs a concurrent ensemble structure to reduce computation time but neglects the utilization of erroneous data. To address this issue, this study combines the advantages of voting and boosting methods and proposes a new two-stage voting boosting (2SVB) concurrent ensemble learning method for social network sentiment classification. This novel method not only establishes a concurrent ensemble framework to decrease computation time but also optimizes the utilization of erroneous data and enhances ensemble performance. To optimize the utilization of erroneous data, a two-stage training approach is implemented. Stage-1 training is performed on the datasets by employing a 3-fold cross-segmentation approach. Stage-2 training is carried out on datasets that have been augmented with the erroneous data predicted by stage 1. To augment the diversity of base classifiers, the training stage employs five pre-trained deep learning (PDL) models with heterogeneous pre-training frameworks as base classifiers. To reduce the computation time, a two-stage concurrent ensemble framework was established. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an F1 score of 0.8942 on the coronavirus tweet sentiment dataset, surpassing other comparable ensemble methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.