ReviewCancers2023
Cancer Immunotherapy: Where Next?
Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Molecular mechanism of RBM14-mediated promotion of proliferation, migration, and invasion in osteosarcoma.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Editorial: Women in cancer molecular targets and therapeutics, volume II: 2022.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A historical perspective on HLA.Immunotherapy advances · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fundamental problem of dealing with cancer is that cancer cells are so like normal cells that it is very hard to find differences that can be a basis for treatment without severe side effects. The key to successful cancer immunotherapy will be based on a very careful choice of cancer targets that are sufficiently cancer specific not to cause serious side effects. There are two fundamentally different ways to deploy the immune system for such cancer treatments. One is to increase the efficacy of the cancer patient's own immune system so that it attacks these differences. This has been achieved by "checkpoint blocking" which is very successful but only with a relatively small proportion of cancers. Secondly, one can produce antibodies, or T cells, whose specificity is directed against proteins expressed differentially in cancers. CART cell treatments have proved very effective for some blood cancers but not so far for common solid tumours. Humanised, unmodified monoclonal antibodies have been used extensively for the treatment of certain adenocarcinomas with modest success. However, using antibodies together with the body's own immune system to treat cancers by engineering monoclonal antibodies that are directed at both a target antigen on the cancer cell surface and also against T cells shows promise for the development of novel immunotherapies. Genes can be found which are expressed highly in some cancers but with a low or absent expression on normal tissues and so are good novel targets. It is so far, only immune-based killing that can kill bystander target negative cells, which is essential for successful treatment since hardly ever will all the cells in a cancer express any desired target. We conclude that, while there still may be many hurdles in the way, engineered bispecific T cell attracting monoclonal antibody-mediated killing of cancer cells may be the most promising approach for achieving novel effective cancer immunotherapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.