Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190263›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Adjuvant Therapy for Elderly Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Surgery: Outcomes in Real World Practice.

Paul Rogowski, Stephan Schönecker, Dinah Konnerth, Annemarie Schäfer, Montserrat Pazos, Aurélie Gaasch, Maximilian Niyazi, Edwin Boelke, Christiane Matuschek, Jan Haussmann and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Research with cancer registry data in radiation oncology-current possibilities and perspectives : A narrative review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul RogowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-8896
Stephan SchöneckerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Dinah KonnerthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Annemarie SchäferDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Montserrat PazosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Aurélie GaaschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0138-9930
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Edwin BoelkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9112-1024
Christiane MatuschekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jan HaussmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
Michael BraunBreast Centre, Red Cross Hospital, 80634 Munich, Germany.
Martin PölcherBreast Centre, Red Cross Hospital, 80634 Munich, Germany.
Rachel WürstleinBreast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CCC Munich LMU, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9744-7372
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital LMU, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8709-7252
LMU Klinikum · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEGerman Red Cross · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the standard of care of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in elderly female patients (≥65 years) treated outside of clinical trials and to identify potential factors related to the omission of RT and the interaction with endocrine therapy (ET). All women treated with BCS at two major breast centers between 1998 and 2014 were evaluated. Data were provided by the Tumor Registry Munich. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The median follow-up was 88.4 months. Adjuvant RT was performed in 82% (2599/3171) of patients. Irradiated patients were younger (70.9 vs. 76.5 years,

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast-conserving surgeryelderlyendocrine therapylocal controllocal recurrenceoutcomeradiotherapysurvival

Identifiers

PMID37190263
PMCPMC10137115
OpenAlexW4366184905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.