Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190219›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Last Resort from Nursing Shortage? Comparative Cost Analysis of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomies with a Focus on the Costs of Nursing Care.

Philip Zeuschner, Carolin Böttcher, Lutz Hager, Johannes Linxweiler, Michael Stöckle, Stefan Siemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip ZeuschnerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, 66123 Homburg, Saarland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8898-6588
Carolin BöttcherDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, 66123 Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Lutz HagerSRH Distance Learning University, Kirchstraße 26, 88499 Riedlingen, Germany.
Johannes LinxweilerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, 66123 Homburg, Saarland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2852-2436
Michael StöckleDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, 66123 Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
Stefan SiemerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, 66123 Homburg, Saarland, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7670-8644

Funding

Intuitve European Research Board 2022-006 UR DE NURS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite perioperative advantages, robot-assisted surgery is associated with high costs. However, the lower morbidity of robotic surgery could lead to a lower nursing workload and cost savings. In this comparative cost analysis of open retroperitoneal versus robot-assisted transperitoneal partial nephrectomies (PN), these possible cost savings, including other cost factors, were quantified. Therefore, patient, tumor characteristics, and surgical results of all PN within two years at a tertiary referral center were retrospectively analyzed. The nursing effort was quantified by the local nursing staff regulation and INPULS

Indexed as

cost analysishealth economicsnursing shortagepartial nephrectomyrobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID37190219
PMCPMC10137045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.