Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190193›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Patient Experience Factors and Implications for Improvement Based on the Treatment Journey of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

Yoori Koo, Eunjeong Kim, Yelin Jo, Innchul Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Predictors of survival among head and neck cancer patients after radiotherapy based on health-related quality of life indices and symptoms-specific outcomes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoori KooDepartment of Service Design, Graduate School of Industrial Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2795-8695
Eunjeong KimDepartment of Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-8932
Yelin JoDepartment of Visual Communication Design, Graduate School of Design, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea.
Innchul NamDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon 21431, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9246-1047

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the treatment journey, this study aimed to present insights into improving the patient-centered service experience for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. We interviewed and observed patients, caregivers, and doctors. We conducted a qualitative content analysis and service clue analysis to identify barriers and enablers to patient care and to derive insights into the patient experience (PE). We received feedback from doctors considering the priority, importance, and feasibility of improvements and classified the insights into three service experience aspects, to suggest improvement directions. As a result, the 'functional' aspect of service experience stressed the importance of a comprehensive guide to the treatment process, delivery of reliable information, use of easy-to-understand terms, repeated summary explanations, the establishment of close and flexible linkages between departments, and the provision of educational programs. Regarding the 'mechanic' aspect, the use of large and clear visuals for patients, to easily understand the care information provided by medical staff was distinguished. In the 'humanic' aspect, patients' psychological stability, trust in doctors, and doctor's encouragement and support through maintaining a positive attitude were prioritized. This qualitative study provided integrative insights into the HNC patient experience, through the application of service design methodologies, such as a patient journey map, participatory research methods, and service experience clues.

Indexed as

aspects of service experiencebarriers to patient experiencehead and neck cancerpatient-centered carepatient journey mappatient treatment journeyuser’s integrative perspectives

Identifiers

PMID37190193
PMCPMC10136947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.