Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37190181›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

MRI-Based Deep Learning Tools for MGMT Promoter Methylation Detection: A Thorough Evaluation.

Lucas Robinet, Aurore Siegfried, Margaux Roques, Ahmad Berjaoui, Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas RobinetIRT Saint-Exupéry, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8796-8361
Aurore SiegfriedINSERM UMR 1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse (CRCT), University Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 31100 Toulouse, France.
Margaux RoquesDepartment of Neuroradiology, Hopital Pierre Paul Riquet, CHU Purpan, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Ahmad BerjaouiIRT Saint-Exupéry, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-1543
Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan MoyalIUCT-Oncopole-Institut Claudius Regaud, 31100 Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, which almost systematically relapses despite surgery (when possible) followed by radio-chemotherapy temozolomide-based treatment. Upon relapse, one option for treatment is another chemotherapy, lomustine. The efficacy of these chemotherapy regimens depends on the methylation of a specific gene promoter known as MGMT, which is the main prognosis factor for glioblastoma. Knowing this biomarker is a key issue for the clinician to personalize and adapt treatment to the patient at primary diagnosis for elderly patients, in particular, and also upon relapse. The association between MRI-derived information and the prediction of MGMT promoter status has been discussed in many studies, and some, more recently, have proposed the use of deep learning algorithms on multimodal scans to extract this information, but they have failed to reach a consensus. Therefore, in this work, beyond the classical performance figures usually displayed, we seek to compute confidence scores to see if a clinical application of such methods can be seriously considered. The systematic approach carried out, using different input configurations and algorithms as well as the exact methylation percentage, led to the following conclusion: current deep learning methods are unable to determine MGMT promoter methylation from MRI data.

Indexed as

confidencedeep learningglioblastomaMGMT promoter

Identifiers

PMID37190181
PMCPMC10137327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.