Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189913›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Managing Prognosis in Precision Medicine: Utility, Imagination, and Communication.

Rebecca Mueller, Brittany M Lee, Katharine Press Callahan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Future of Newborn Genomic Testing.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca MuellerDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0863-1395
Brittany M LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9551-815X
Katharine Press CallahanDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2221-6254
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The Penn Postdoctoral Training Program in the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Genetics and GenomicsT32HG009496 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Steven Joffe · 2017 to 2026
$3.4M
Palliative Care Research Training GrantT32HL125195 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KROSS, ERIN KATHRYN, SHARMA, RASHMI K. · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG009496NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG009496NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL125195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on how physicians predict and communicate prognosis focuses primarily on end-of-life care. Unsurprisingly, as genomic technology gains traction as a prognostic tool, the focus has also been on terminality, with research focused on how genetic results may be used to terminate pregnancies or redirect care towards palliation for neonates. However, genomic results also have powerful impacts on how patients who live prepare for their futures. Genomic testing provides broad-reaching and early-albeit complex, uncertain, and shifting-prognostic information. In this essay, we argue that as genomic testing occurs earlier and increasingly in a screening context, researchers and clinicians must strive to understand and manage the prognostic implications of results. While our understanding of the psychosocial and communicational aspects of prognosis in symptomatic populations is incomplete, it has progressed further than our understanding in a screening context and therefore provides useful lessons and feasible opportunities for further research. By providing an interdisciplinary and inter-specialty perspective on the psychosocial and communicational aspects of prognosis in genetics, we discuss prognostication with respect to genetics from the neonatal period through adulthood, highlighting medical specialties and patient populations that are especially informative for considering the longitudinal management of prognostic information in genomic medicine.

Indexed as

communicationethicsexome sequencinggenomicmolecular profilingprognosisprognostic utilitypsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID37189913
PMCPMC10136899
OpenAlexW4362468828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.