ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Survey of Current Practice in Operative Management of Testicular Torsion in Poland.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retractile Testis in the Pediatric Population: Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Management Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The management of testicular torsion: A survey of Turkish pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate heterogeneity in the current management of testicular torsion (TT). A secondary aim is to investigate incidences of recurrent torsion and the methods used for primary fixation. An online multiple-choice questionnaire comprising 10 questions was distributed to paediatric surgeons and urologists. There were a total of 99 questionnaires distributed to representatives from 39 paediatric surgery and urology departments in Poland. The majority of participants agreed on fixation of the torsed testicle (98%). Use of sutures was reported by 95% of surgeons: absorbable by 48%, non-absorbable by 42%, and 4% using both. There was no consensus on the number of sutures. The contralateral testicle was always fixed by 69%, with 28% fixing it only in case of necrosis and amputation of the torsed testicle, and the remaining 2% never fixing the contralateral side. In case of negative scrotal exploration, 18% of surgeons would still fix the testis. The recurrence of torsion after prior fixation was identified by eight of the participants. The most commonly reported primarily used technique was absorbable sutures. There is a general consensus on the fixation of torsed testicles; however, other aspects remain controversial. Based on the survey and the literature review, the use of non-absorbable sutures rather than absorbable sutures would be advisable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.