Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189752›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2023

The Utility of Urodynamic Studies in Neuro-Urological Patients.

Andry Perrin, Jacques Corcos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neurogenic Bladder in Children with Myelomeningocele.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andry PerrinDepartment of Urology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Jacques CorcosDepartment of Urology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe utility of a clinical tool lies in its clinical performance evaluation and describes the relevance and usefulness of that tool in a medical setting. The utility of urodynamic and video-urodynamic studies in the management of specific urodynamic profiles in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic approach in neuro-urological patients is the focus of the current review.

methodsFor this narrative review, a PubMed ANALYSIS: Assessment of the utility of urodynamic study was performed during the diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic steps of the neuro-urological patients' management. We focused on its clinical performance in the identification and evaluation of several unfavorable events, such as neurogenic detrusor overactivity, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, elevated detrusor leak point pressure and the presence of vesico-ureteral reflux, which may be indicators for a higher risk for the development of urological comorbidities.

conclusionDespite the paucity of existing literature assessing the utility of urodynamic study-specifically video-urodynamic study-in neuro-urological patients, it does remain the gold standard to assess lower urinary tract function precisely in this patient category. With regard to its utility, it is associated with high clinical performance at every step of management. The feedback on possible unfavorable events allows for prognostic assessment and may lead us to question current recommendations.

Indexed as

clinical performanceneurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunctionupper urinary tract deteriorationurodynamic studyutilityvideo-urodynamic study

Identifiers

PMID37189752
PMCPMC10136172
OpenAlexW4362733584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.