Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189602›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Craniovertebral Junction Instability after Oncological Resection: A Narrative Review.

Malte Ottenhausen, Elena Greco, Giacomo Bertolini, Andrea Gerosa, Salvatore Ippolito, Erik H Middlebrooks, Graziano Serrao, Maria Grazia Bruzzone, Francesco Costa, Paolo Ferroli and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Clival Chordomas.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Malte OttenhausenDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Elena GrecoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2738-8143
Giacomo BertoliniHead and Neck Department, Neurosurgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Andrea GerosaHead and Neck Department, Neurosurgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Salvatore IppolitoHead and Neck Department, Neurosurgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Erik H MiddlebrooksDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Graziano SerraoDepartment of Health Sciences, San Paolo Medical School, Università Degli Studi di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9651-7685
Maria Grazia BruzzoneDepartment of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Francesco CostaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Paolo FerroliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Emanuele La CorteDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3752-8629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The craniovertebral junction (CVJ) is a complex transition area between the skull and cervical spine. Pathologies such as chordoma, chondrosarcoma and aneurysmal bone cysts may be encountered in this anatomical area and may predispose individuals to joint instability. An adequate clinical and radiological assessment is mandatory to predict any postoperative instability and the need for fixation. There is no common consensus on the need for, timing and setting of craniovertebral fixation techniques after a craniovertebral oncological surgery. The aim of the present review is to summarize the anatomy, biomechanics and pathology of the craniovertebral junction and to describe the available surgical approaches to and considerations of joint instability after craniovertebral tumor resections. Although a one-size-fits-all approach cannot encompass the extremely challenging pathologies encountered in the CVJ area, including the possible mechanical instability that is a consequence of oncological resections, the optimal surgical strategy (anterior vs posterior vs posterolateral) tailored to the patient's needs can be assessed preoperatively in many instances. Preserving the intrinsic and extrinsic ligaments, principally the transverse ligament, and the bony structures, namely the C1 anterior arch and occipital condyle, ensures spinal stability in most of the cases. Conversely, in situations that require the removal of those structures, or in cases where they are disrupted by the tumor, a thorough clinical and radiological assessment is needed to timely detect any instability and to plan a surgical stabilization procedure. We hope that this review will help shed light on the current evidence and pave the way for future studies on this topic.

Indexed as

atlantoaxial fusionatlanto-occipital jointchordomaendoscopic surgical procedurejoint instabilityskull basespinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID37189602
PMCPMC10137736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.