Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189595›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

An Ensemble of Deep Learning Object Detection Models for Anatomical and Pathological Regions in Brain MRI.

Ramazan Terzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ramazan TerziDepartment of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, Digital Transformation Office of the Presidency of Republic of Türkiye, Ankara 06100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2345-8666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes ensemble strategies for the deep learning object detection models carried out by combining the variants of a model and different models to enhance the anatomical and pathological object detection performance in brain MRI. In this study, with the help of the novel Gazi Brains 2020 dataset, five different anatomical parts and one pathological part that can be observed in brain MRI were identified, such as the region of interest, eye, optic nerves, lateral ventricles, third ventricle, and a whole tumor. Firstly, comprehensive benchmarking of the nine state-of-the-art object detection models was carried out to determine the capabilities of the models in detecting the anatomical and pathological parts. Then, four different ensemble strategies for nine object detectors were applied to boost the detection performance using the bounding box fusion technique. The ensemble of individual model variants increased the anatomical and pathological object detection performance by up to 10% in terms of the mean average precision (mAP). In addition, considering the class-based average precision (AP) value of the anatomical parts, an up to 18% AP improvement was achieved. Similarly, the ensemble strategy of the best different models outperformed the best individual model by 3.3% mAP. Additionally, while an up to 7% better FAUC, which is the area under the TPR vs. FPPI curve, was achieved on the Gazi Brains 2020 dataset, a 2% better FAUC score was obtained on the BraTS 2020 dataset. The proposed ensemble strategies were found to be much more efficient in finding the anatomical and pathological parts with a small number of anatomic objects, such as the optic nerve and third ventricle, and producing higher TPR values, especially at low FPPI values, compared to the best individual methods.

Indexed as

anatomical and pathological object detectionbenchmarkbrain MRImodel ensemble

Identifiers

PMID37189595
PMCPMC10137632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.