ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023
An Ensemble of Deep Learning Object Detection Models for Anatomical and Pathological Regions in Brain MRI.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Measurement of Murine Bone Length in Radiographs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- In-Domain Transfer Learning Strategy for Tumor Detection on Brain MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes ensemble strategies for the deep learning object detection models carried out by combining the variants of a model and different models to enhance the anatomical and pathological object detection performance in brain MRI. In this study, with the help of the novel Gazi Brains 2020 dataset, five different anatomical parts and one pathological part that can be observed in brain MRI were identified, such as the region of interest, eye, optic nerves, lateral ventricles, third ventricle, and a whole tumor. Firstly, comprehensive benchmarking of the nine state-of-the-art object detection models was carried out to determine the capabilities of the models in detecting the anatomical and pathological parts. Then, four different ensemble strategies for nine object detectors were applied to boost the detection performance using the bounding box fusion technique. The ensemble of individual model variants increased the anatomical and pathological object detection performance by up to 10% in terms of the mean average precision (mAP). In addition, considering the class-based average precision (AP) value of the anatomical parts, an up to 18% AP improvement was achieved. Similarly, the ensemble strategy of the best different models outperformed the best individual model by 3.3% mAP. Additionally, while an up to 7% better FAUC, which is the area under the TPR vs. FPPI curve, was achieved on the Gazi Brains 2020 dataset, a 2% better FAUC score was obtained on the BraTS 2020 dataset. The proposed ensemble strategies were found to be much more efficient in finding the anatomical and pathological parts with a small number of anatomic objects, such as the optic nerve and third ventricle, and producing higher TPR values, especially at low FPPI values, compared to the best individual methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.