Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189589›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Update on the Applications of Radiomics in Diagnosis, Staging, and Recurrence of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Maria Chiara Brunese, Maria Rita Fantozzi, Roberta Fusco, Federica De Muzio, Michela Gabelloni, Ginevra Danti, Alessandra Borgheresi, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Federico Bruno, Nicoletta Gandolfo and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Maria Chiara BruneseDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Maria Rita FantozziClinical Pharmacology Unit, A. Cardarelli Hospital, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Federica De MuzioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Michela GabelloniNuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6668-499X
Ginevra DantiItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-8119
Alessandra BorgheresiDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche", 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-0092
Federico BrunoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1444-2585
Nicoletta GandolfoDiagnostic Imaging Department, Villa Scassi Hospital-ASL 3, 16149 Genoa, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital "Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche", 60121 Ancona, Italy.
Vittorio MieleItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-1567
Antonio BarileDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-3583
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper offers an assessment of radiomics tools in the evaluation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

methodsThe PubMed database was searched for papers published in the English language no earlier than October 2022.

resultsWe found 236 studies, and 37 satisfied our research criteria. Several studies addressed multidisciplinary topics, especially diagnosis, prognosis, response to therapy, and prediction of staging (TNM) or pathomorphological patterns. In this review, we have covered diagnostic tools developed through machine learning, deep learning, and neural network for the recurrence and prediction of biological characteristics. The majority of the studies were retrospective.

conclusionsIt is possible to conclude that many performing models have been developed to make differential diagnosis easier for radiologists to predict recurrence and genomic patterns. However, all the studies were retrospective, lacking further external validation in prospective and multicentric cohorts. Furthermore, the radiomics models and the expression of results should be standardized and automatized to be applicable in clinical practice.

Indexed as

diagnosisintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaradiomicsrecurrencestaging

Identifiers

PMID37189589
PMCPMC10137417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.