Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189555›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Is There Still a Role for Two-Phase Contrast-Enhanced CT and Virtual Monoenergetic Images in the Era of Photon-Counting Detector CT?

Arne Estler, Konstantin Nikolaou, Stefan O Schönberg, Fabian Bamberg, Matthias F Froelich, Fabian Tollens, Niklas Verloh, Jakob Weiss, Marius Horger, Florian Hagen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arne EstlerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1930-7497
Konstantin NikolaouDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-7325
Stefan O SchönbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias F FroelichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-2147
Fabian TollensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2340-1785
Niklas VerlohDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8424-5827
Jakob WeissDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Marius HorgerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Florian HagenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1215-9428
University of Tübingen · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the diagnostic characteristics between arterial phase imaging versus portal venous phase imaging, applying polychromatic T3D images and low keV virtual monochromatic images using a 1st generation photon-counting CT detector, of CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsConsecutive patients with HCC, with a clinical indication for CT imaging, were prospectively enrolled. Virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) were reconstructed at 40 to 70 keV for the PCD-CT. Two independent, blinded radiologists counted all hepatic lesions and quantified their size. The lesion-to-background ratio was quantified for both phases. SNR and CNR were determined for T3D and low VMI images; non-parametric statistics were used.

resultsAmong 49 oncologic patients (mean age 66.9 ± 11.2 years, eight females), HCC was detected in both arterial and portal venous scans. The signal-to-noise ratio, the CNR liver-to-muscle, the CNR tumor-to-liver, and CNR tumor-to-muscle were 6.58 ± 2.86, 1.40 ± 0.42, 1.13 ± 0.49, and 1.53 ± 0.76 in the arterial phase and 5.93 ± 2.97, 1.73 ± 0.38, 0.79 ± 0.30, and 1.36 ± 0.60 in the portal venous phase with PCD-CT, respectively. There was no significant difference in SNR between the arterial and portal venous phases, including between "T3D" and low keV images (

conclusionsThe arterial contrast phase imaging provides higher lesion-to-background ratios of HCC lesions using a PCD-CT; especially, at 40 keV. However, the difference was not subjectively perceived as significant.

Indexed as

dual-phase contrast-enhanced CTdual-source CTphoton counting CT

Identifiers

PMID37189555
PMCPMC10138063
OpenAlexW4366285750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.