Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189521›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Natural Language Processing for Breast Imaging: A Systematic Review.

Kareem Mahmoud Diab, Jamie Deng, Yusen Wu, Yelena Yesha, Fernando Collado-Mesa, Phuong Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kareem Mahmoud DiabInstitute for Data Science and Computing, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA.
Jamie DengDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA.
Yusen WuInstitute for Data Science and Computing, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA.
Yelena YeshaInstitute for Data Science and Computing, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA.
Fernando Collado-MesaDepartment of Radiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA.
Phuong NguyenInstitute for Data Science and Computing, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) has gained prominence in diagnostic radiology, offering a promising tool for improving breast imaging triage, diagnosis, lesion characterization, and treatment management in breast cancer and other breast diseases. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in NLP for breast imaging, covering the main techniques and applications in this field. Specifically, we discuss various NLP methods used to extract relevant information from clinical notes, radiology reports, and pathology reports and their potential impact on the accuracy and efficiency of breast imaging. In addition, we reviewed the state-of-the-art in NLP-based decision support systems for breast imaging, highlighting the challenges and opportunities of NLP applications for breast imaging in the future. Overall, this review underscores the potential of NLP in enhancing breast imaging care and offers insights for clinicians and researchers interested in this exciting and rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast imagingNatural Language Processingpathology reportsradiology reportssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37189521
PMCPMC10137579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.