Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189485›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

A Framework of Faster CRNN and VGG16-Enhanced Region Proposal Network for Detection and Grade Classification of Knee RA.

Saravanan Srinivasan, Subathra Gunasekaran, Sandeep Kumar Mathivanan, Prabhu Jayagopal, Muhammad Attique Khan, Areej Alasiry, Mehrez Marzougui, Anum Masood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saravanan SrinivasanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, India.
Subathra GunasekaranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600119, India.
Sandeep Kumar MathivananSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8572-1197
Prabhu JayagopalSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3335-6911
Muhammad Attique KhanDepartment of Computer Science, HITEC University, Taxila 47080, Pakistan.
Areej AlasiryCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.
Mehrez MarzouguiCollege of Computer Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-5371
Anum MasoodDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7034 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5411-8969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a framework to detect and grade knee RA using digital X-radiation images and used it to demonstrate the ability of deep learning approaches to detect knee RA using a consensus-based decision (CBD) grading system. The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency with which a deep learning approach based on artificial intelligence (AI) can find and determine the severity of knee RA in digital X-radiation images. The study comprised people over 50 years with RA symptoms, such as knee joint pain, stiffness, crepitus, and functional impairments. The digitized X-radiation images of the people were obtained from the BioGPS database repository. We used 3172 digital X-radiation images of the knee joint from an anterior-posterior perspective. The trained Faster-CRNN architecture was used to identify the knee joint space narrowing (JSN) area in digital X-radiation images and extract the features using ResNet-101 with domain adaptation. In addition, we employed another well-trained model (VGG16 with domain adaptation) for knee RA severity classification. Medical experts graded the X-radiation images of the knee joint using a consensus-based decision score. We trained the enhanced-region proposal network (ERPN) using this manually extracted knee area as the test dataset image. An X-radiation image was fed into the final model, and a consensus decision was used to grade the outcome. The presented model correctly identified the marginal knee JSN region with 98.97% of accuracy, with a total knee RA intensity classification accuracy of 99.10%, with a sensitivity of 97.3%, a specificity of 98.2%, a precision of 98.1%, and a dice score of 90.1% compared with other conventional models.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)consensus-based decisiondigital X-radiation imageenhanced-region proposal networkfaster-CNNjoint space narrowingrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID37189485
PMCPMC10137623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.