SynthesisStem cell research & therapy2023
Evaluating the efficacy of human dental pulp stem cells and scaffold combination for bone regeneration in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regenerative potential of human dental pulp stem cells in scaffold-based alveolar and jaw bone reconstruction: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Advancing wound healing by hydrogel-based dressings loaded with cell-conditioned medium: a systematic review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Osteogenic Marker Expression after SHED and PMMA-HA Scaffold Application in Alveolar Bone Defects.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparison of the osteoinductive potential of preconditioned dental pulp stem cell secretome versus their exosomes.Odontology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles combined with injectable hydrogels in bone defect repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Can Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Bone Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stem cells international · 2026Review
- Stem cell-based scaffolds using dental pulp and adipose-derived stem cells in periodontal regeneration: Evidence from preclinical or clinical studies.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Magnesium-doped bioactive glass enhances bone regeneration by reversing replicative senescence of human dental pulp stem cells in bone defect therapy.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvaria Using 3D-Printed Scaffolds with Graded Porosity and In Vitro Degradation.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Engineering an Integrated Bioprocess to Produce Human Dental Pulp Stem Cell-Alginate-Based Bone Organoids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Assessment of Endocyn on Dental Pulp Stem Cells (DPSCs): A Pilot Study of Endodontic Irrigant Effects.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Challenges and future perspectives in using mesenchymal stem cells for efficient bone fracture healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The Impact of Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold Enrichment on Bone Regeneration In Vivo-A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Scaffold Application for Bone Regeneration with Stem Cells in Dentistry: Literature Review.Cells · 2024Review
- Article
- Towards Stem Cell Therapy for Critical-Sized Segmental Bone Defects: Current Trends and Challenges on the Path to Clinical Translation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Amino acid-based supramolecular chiral hydrogels promote osteogenesis of human dental pulp stem cells via the MAPK pathway.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Exosomes as Promising Therapeutic Tools for Regenerative Endodontic Therapy.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the efficacy of using dental pulp graft in the healing of the alveolar bone after impacted canine extraction: a prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Editorial: Tissue regeneration using dental stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHuman adult dental pulp stem cells (hDPSC) and stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED) hold promise in bone regeneration for their easy accessibility, high proliferation rate, self-renewal and osteogenic differentiation capacity. Various organic and inorganic scaffold materials were pre-seeded with human dental pulp stem cells in animals, with promising outcomes in new bone formation. Nevertheless, the clinical trial for bone regeneration using dental pulp stem cells is still in its infancy. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to synthesise the evidence of the efficacy of human dental pulp stem cells and the scaffold combination for bone regeneration in animal bone defect models. METHODOLOGY: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD2021274976), and PRISMA guideline was followed to include the relevant full-text papers using exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data were extracted for the systematic review. Quality assessment and the risk of bias were also carried out using the CAMARADES tool. Quantitative bone regeneration data of the experimental (scaffold + hDPSC/SHED) and the control (scaffold-only) groups were also extracted for meta-analysis.
resultsForty-nine papers were included for systematic review and only 27 of them were qualified for meta-analysis. 90% of the included papers were assessed as medium to low risk. In the meta-analysis, qualified studies were grouped by the unit of bone regeneration measurement. Overall, bone regeneration was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) in experimental group (scaffold + hDPSC/SHED) compared to the control group (scaffold-only) (SMD: 1.863, 95% CI 1.121-2.605). However, the effect is almost entirely driven by the % new bone formation group (SMD: 3.929, 95% CI 2.612-5.246) while % BV/TV (SMD: 2.693, 95% CI - 0.001-5.388) shows a marginal effect. Dogs and hydroxyapatite-containing scaffolds have the highest capacity in % new bone formation in response to human DPSC/SHED. The funnel plot exhibits no apparent asymmetry representing a lack of remarkable publication bias. Sensitivity analysis also indicated that the results generated in this meta-analysis are robust and reliable.
conclusionThis is the first synthesised evidence showing that human DPSCs/SHED and scaffold combination enhanced bone regeneration highly significantly compared to the cell-free scaffold irrespective of scaffold type and animal species used. So, dental pulp stem cells could be a promising tool for treating various bone diseases, and more clinical trials need to be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of dental pulp stem cell-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.