ArticleBMC nursing2023
Research article Individual innovation from the perspective of nursing students: A qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and evaluation of an individual innovation model for nursing students: a mixed-method study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Mapping Competence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nursing Practice: An Item Response Theory Analysis of Perceived Skill Acquisition and Maintenance in Italy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fostering Healthcare Innovation: A Mixed-Methods Study of an Impact Entrepreneurship Course for Nurse Practitioner Students.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Are nursing students ready for robotic nurses in obstetrics and gynecologic clinics? a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Nursing postgraduates' innovative behaviour, influencing factors and educational requirements: a national cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Individual Innovativeness and Start-Up Attitude Among Nursing Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne of the necessities of today's world that prepares nursing students for their future professional roles is the concept of individual innovation. However, there is no clear definition of individual innovation in nursing. This study was designed and implemented with the aim of investigating the concept of individual innovation from the perspective of nursing students using qualitative content analysis.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted from September 2020 to May 2021 on 11 nursing students of one of the nursing schools in southern Iran. The participants were selected by purposive sampling method. Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews. Data analysis was done using conventional content analysis and MAXQDA 2018.
resultsFollowing data analysis, 662 initial codes were extracted forming 9 categories and three main themes. The themes included personal and professional dynamism, professional inventiveness, and the integration of innovation drivers.
conclusionsThe concept of individual innovation in the nursing student included personal and professional dynamics and professional inventiveness. Individual innovation occurred through combination of innovation drivers. Managers and policy makers of nursing education can use the results of this to get acquainted with this concept and develop policies and guidelines to develop nursing students' individual innovation. Through getting familiar with the concept of individual innovation, nursing students can try to flourish this characteristic in themselves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.