Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37189026›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Understanding the spatial heterogeneity of COVID-19 vaccination uptake in England.

Huanfa Chen, Yanjia Cao, Lingru Feng, Qunshan Zhao, José Rafael Verduzco Torres

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huanfa ChenCentre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London, UK. huanfa.chen@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4518-7601
Yanjia CaoDepartment of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-8924
Lingru FengCentre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8343-2383
Qunshan ZhaoUrban Big Data Centre, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5549-9457
José Rafael Verduzco TorresUrban Big Data Centre, School of Social & Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1324-1714

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass vaccination has been a key strategy in effectively containing global COVID-19 pandemic that posed unprecedented social and economic challenges to many countries. However, vaccination rates vary across space and socio-economic factors, and are likely to depend on the accessibility to vaccination services, which is under-researched in literature. This study aims to empirically identify the spatially heterogeneous relationship between COVID-19 vaccination rates and socio-economic factors in England.

methodsWe investigated the percentage of over-18 fully vaccinated people at the small-area level across England up to 18 November 2021. We used multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to model the spatially heterogeneous relationship between vaccination rates and socio-economic determinants, including ethnic, age, economic, and accessibility factors.

resultsThis study indicates that the selected MGWR model can explain 83.2% of the total variance of vaccination rates. The variables exhibiting a positive association with vaccination rates in most areas include proportion of population over 40, car ownership, average household income, and spatial accessibility to vaccination. In contrast, population under 40, less deprived population, and black or mixed ethnicity are negatively associated with the vaccination rates.

conclusionsOur findings indicate the importance of improving the spatial accessibility to vaccinations in developing regions and among specific population groups in order to promote COVID-19 vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEnglandHumansPandemicsVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccinationEnglandMGWRSocio-economic factorsSpatial accessibility

Identifiers

PMID37189026
PMCPMC10185460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.