Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188985›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

A real-world analysis of survival and cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar regimen in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Xianghua Zeng, Yingxin Jia, Hongmei Chen, Qinli Luo, Huakan Zhao, Guanzhong Liang, Wen Chen, Yongsheng Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xianghua ZengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Yingxin JiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Deyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Deyang, 618000, China.
Hongmei ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chongqing Ba'nan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing, 400055, China.
Qinli LuoHealth Examination and Oncology Screening Center, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Huakan ZhaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Guanzhong LiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing, 400030, China. 836049985@qq.com.
Yongsheng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Chongqing Cancer Institute, Chongqing, 400030, China. lys@cqu.edu.cn.
Chongqing Cancer Hospital · CNChongqing University · CNAnyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFirst People's Hospital of Chongqing · CN

Funding

Decision Consultation Management Innovation Project of Shapingba District Jcd202278Scientific research project of Chongqing Medical Biotechnology Association cmba2022kyym-skxmG006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProgrammed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab plus bevacizumab has been approved as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). However, the clinical benefits of sintilimab plus bevacizumab in a real-world setting in China is insufficiently defined to date. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar in a real-word cohort of patients with aHCC from China.

methodsWe reviewed the clinical data of 112 consecutive patients with aHCC who received sintilimab plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment in Chongqing University Cancer hospital between July, 2021 and December, 2022. Overall survival, progression-free survival, overall response rate, and adverse event rates were assessed based on the RECIST 1.1. The survival curves were grafted by Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsSixty-eight patients with aHCC were included our study. Efficacy evaluation results showed that 8 patients were partial remission, 51 patients were stable and 9 patients showed progression disease. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 344.00 (168.77-419.23) days and 238.00 (174.56-301.44) days, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 35 patients (51.5%), including 9 patients with grade ≥ 3. The life-year (LY) and quality-adjusted LY (QALY) were 1.97 and 2.92, respectively, with a cost of $35,018.

conclusionOur data confirmed the promising efficacy, tolerable toxicity and cost-effectiveness in Chinese patients with aHCC who received sintilimab plus bevacizumab as the first-line therapy regimen in real-world practice.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalssintilimabBevacizumab biosimilarCost-effectivenessHepatocellular carcinomaSintilimabSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37188985
PMCPMC10185451
OpenAlexW4376601830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.