Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188886›Full record

ArticleNeurology and therapy2023

Predicting the Societal Value of Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease in Japan: A Patient-Level Simulation.

Ataru Igarashi, Mie Kasai Azuma, Quanwu Zhang, Weicheng Ye, Aditya Sardesai, Henri Folse, Ameya Chavan, Kiyoyuki Tomita, Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Adapting prescribing criteria for amyloid-targeted antibodies for adults with Down syndrome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ataru IgarashiDepartment of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mie Kasai AzumaMedical Headquarter, Clinical Planning and Development, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Quanwu ZhangGlobal Alzheimer's Disease and Brain Health, Eisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd., Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA.
Weicheng YeEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Aditya SardesaiEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Henri FolseEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Ameya ChavanEvidence Synthesis, Modeling and Communication, Evidera Inc., Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Kiyoyuki TomitaAD Value and Access Planning, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Amir Abbas Tahami MonfaredGlobal Alzheimer's Disease and Brain Health, Eisai Inc., 200 Metro Blvd., Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA. Amir_Tahami@eisai.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4003-3192
Eisai (Japan) · JPEisai (United States) · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAThe University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder that progresses from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia, is responsible for significant burden on caregivers and healthcare systems. In this study, data from the large phase III CLARITY AD trial were used to estimate the societal value of lecanemab plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone against a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds from a healthcare and societal perspective in Japan.

methodsA disease simulation model was used to evaluate the impact of lecanemab on disease progression in early AD based on data from the phase III CLARITY AD trial and published literature. The model used a series of predictive risk equations based on clinical and biomarker data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease II study. The model predicted key patient outcomes, including life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and total healthcare and informal costs of patients and caregivers.

resultsOver a lifetime horizon, patients treated with lecanemab plus SoC gained an additional 0.73 LYs compared with SoC alone (8.50 years vs. 7.77 years). Lecanemab, with an average treatment duration of 3.68 years, was found to be associated with a 0.91 increase in patient QALYs and a total increase of 0.96 when accounting for caregiver utility. The estimated value of lecanemab varied according to the WTP thresholds (JPY 5-15 million per QALY gained) and the perspective employed. From the narrow healthcare payer's perspective, it ranged from JPY 1,331,305 to JPY 3,939,399. From the broader healthcare payer's perspective, it ranged from JPY 1,636,827 to JPY 4,249,702, while from the societal perspective, it ranged from JPY 1,938,740 to JPY 4,675,818.

conclusionThe use of lecanemab plus SoC would improve health and humanistic outcomes with reduced economic burden for patients and caregivers with early AD in Japan.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseCLARITY ADCost-effectivenessEconomic burdenJapanLecanemabPatient-level simulatorQuality-adjusted life yearsWillingness-to-pay

Identifiers

PMID37188886
PMCPMC10310671
OpenAlexW4376643230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.