ArticleNeurology and therapy2023
Predicting the Societal Value of Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease in Japan: A Patient-Level Simulation.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Japanese Subgroup Analyses from EMERGE and ENGAGE, Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Aducanumab in Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2024Trial
- Public acceptance and expectations for Lecanemab: Insights from a Smallest Worthwhile Difference study.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- The social value of lecanemab for patients with early Alzheimer's disease in Japan.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- Value-based prices of emerging disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease in 174 countries: a cost-effectiveness and threshold analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- The Cost-Effective Price of Lecanemab for Patients with Early Alzheimer's Disease in Sweden.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Article
- Economic Evaluation of Lecanemab for Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease in South Korea.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2025Article
- Use of lecanemab and donanemab in the Canadian healthcare system: Evidence, challenges, and areas for future research.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Review
- Dementia diagnostic and treatment services in the Western Pacific: challenges, preparedness and opportunities in the face of amyloid-targeting therapies.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Review
- Adapting prescribing criteria for amyloid-targeted antibodies for adults with Down syndrome.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- The Potential Economic Impact of the Updated COVID-19 mRNA Fall 2023 Vaccines in Japan.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Are There Shortages and Regional Disparities in Lecanemab Treatment Facilities? A Cross-Sectional Study.Health services insights · 2024Article
- Worth their weight in gray matter? A narrative review of cost-effectiveness analyses of monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disorder that progresses from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia, is responsible for significant burden on caregivers and healthcare systems. In this study, data from the large phase III CLARITY AD trial were used to estimate the societal value of lecanemab plus standard of care (SoC) versus SoC alone against a range of willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds from a healthcare and societal perspective in Japan.
methodsA disease simulation model was used to evaluate the impact of lecanemab on disease progression in early AD based on data from the phase III CLARITY AD trial and published literature. The model used a series of predictive risk equations based on clinical and biomarker data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Assessment of Health Economics in Alzheimer's Disease II study. The model predicted key patient outcomes, including life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and total healthcare and informal costs of patients and caregivers.
resultsOver a lifetime horizon, patients treated with lecanemab plus SoC gained an additional 0.73 LYs compared with SoC alone (8.50 years vs. 7.77 years). Lecanemab, with an average treatment duration of 3.68 years, was found to be associated with a 0.91 increase in patient QALYs and a total increase of 0.96 when accounting for caregiver utility. The estimated value of lecanemab varied according to the WTP thresholds (JPY 5-15 million per QALY gained) and the perspective employed. From the narrow healthcare payer's perspective, it ranged from JPY 1,331,305 to JPY 3,939,399. From the broader healthcare payer's perspective, it ranged from JPY 1,636,827 to JPY 4,249,702, while from the societal perspective, it ranged from JPY 1,938,740 to JPY 4,675,818.
conclusionThe use of lecanemab plus SoC would improve health and humanistic outcomes with reduced economic burden for patients and caregivers with early AD in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.