Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188474›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Knowledge and practice of cervical cancer screening and its associated factors among women attending maternal health services at public health institutions in Assosa Zone, Benishangul-Gumuz, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022: a cross-sectional study.

Firaol Regea Gelassa, Shalama Lekasa Nagari, Desalegn Emana Jebena, Dabeli Belgafo, Daniel Teso, Debela Teshome

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization and Barriers to Uptake in Ethiopia:Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Firaol Regea GelassaNursing, Assosa University, Assosa, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia firaol.regea24.fr@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-9017
Shalama Lekasa NagariPublic Health, Assosa University, Assosa, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-3614-739X
Desalegn Emana JebenaNursing, Assosa University, Assosa, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-4283-2724
Dabeli BelgafoNursing, Assosa University, Assosa, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia.
Daniel TesoNursing, Assosa University, Assosa, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia.
Debela TeshomeNursing, Assosa University, Assosa, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia.
Centre for Nursing Innovation · GBFaculty of Public Health · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer ranks as the second most frequent cancer among all women in Ethiopia and the second most frequent cancer among women between 15 and 44 years of age, resulting in over 4884 moralities annually. Although there is a focus on health promotion through teaching and screening in Ethiopia's intended transition toward universal healthcare, there is little information available on baseline levels of knowledge and screening uptake related to cervical cancer.

objectivesThis study explored the levels of knowledge and screening rates of cervical cancer along with its associated factors among women of reproductive age in Assosa Zone, Benishangul-Gumuz, Ethiopia in 2022. METHODOLOGY: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted. A systematic sampling technique was used to select 213 reproductive-age women from selected health institutions, from 20 April 2022 to 20 July 2022. A validated and pretested questionnaire was used for data collection. Multi-logistic regression analyses were done to identify factors independently associated with cervical cancer screening. Adjusted OR with 95% CI was estimated to measure the strength of association. The level of statistical significance was declared at a p value of <0.05. The results were presented in tables and figures.

resultKnowledge of cervical cancer screening in this study was 53.5%, and 36% of respondents had practised cervical cancer screening. Family history of cervical cancer (AOR)=2.5, 95% CI (1.04 to 6.44)), place of residence (AOR=3.68, 95% CI (2.23, 6.54)) and availability of health services at nearby (AOR=2.03, 95% CI (1.134, 3.643)) were significantly associated with knowledge of cervical cancer screening, while educational status (AOR=2.811, 95% CI (1.038 to 7.610)), knowing someone diagnosed with cervical cancer (AOR=8.3, 95% CI (2.4, 28.69)), Knowledge of cervical cancer(AOR=2.17, 95%CI(1.077, 4.384) and feeling feeling at risk (AOR=3.26 95% CI (1.52, 5.04)) were associated with the practice of cervical cancer screening. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Knowledge and practice of cervical cancer screening in this study were low. Therefore, the reproductive women must be encouraged to have early cervical cancer screening at precancerous stage by informing their susceptibility to cervical cancer.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEthiopiaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyPublic HealthAdult oncologyGynaecological oncologyUrological tumours

Identifiers

PMID37188474
PMCPMC10186432
OpenAlexW4376610110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.