Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188413›Full record

ArticleJournal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing

Peer patient round table: An innovative approach for evaluating clinical performance for nurse practitioner students.

Marjorie H Young, Ibclc, Carey Cole, Eunyoung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marjorie H YoungSchool of Nursing, Radford University, United States of America.
IbclcSchool of Nursing, Radford University, United States of America.
Carey ColeSchool of Nursing, Radford University, United States of America. Electronic address: ccdaly@radford.edu.
Eunyoung LeeSchool of Nursing, Radford University, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical performance is a crucial part of evaluation in nurse practitioner education and has traditionally been accomplished through faculty site visits. The evolution of distance learning and on-line programs along with the recent COVID-19 pandemic has further complicated completing site visits, requiring innovative strategies. 'The Peer Patient Round Table (PPRT)' was developed as an innovative evaluation method of student performance. It utilizes the standardized patient simulation concept and shared role-play modality via a telehealth platform. During the PPRT evaluation session, students were involved in a shared role-play of three roles; as a patient, a nurse practitioner student, and a preceptor in individual scenarios. A family nurse practitioner program at Radford University, located in Southwest Virginia, incorporated the PPRT method as the alternative student evaluation method starting May 2020 during COVID-19 pandemic for the last two years. After the first year of implementation of the PPRT, students and faculty were surveyed about the effectiveness of PPRT as a clinical evaluation method as well as their satisfaction with the modality. This article discusses the details of the PPRT procedures, PPRT experiences from faculty and students along with lessons learned.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, Nursing, GraduateNurse PractitionersStudents, NursingHumansPandemicsStudentsClinical performance evaluationCOVID-19 pandemicEvaluation methodInnovationNP educationPeer Patient Round Table

Identifiers

PMID37188413
PMCPMC10073036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.