Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188327›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2023

An exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) of the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) in bariatric patients.

Kayla Costello, Tom Hildebrandt, Andreas Michaelides, Daniel Herron, Robyn Sysko

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kayla CostelloEating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-9647
Tom HildebrandtEating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Andreas MichaelidesNoom, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Daniel HerronGarlock Division of General Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Robyn SyskoEating and Weight Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNoom (United States) · US

Funding

Conduits: Mount Sinai Health System Translational Science HubUL1TR004419 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rosalind J Wright · 2022 to 2026
$46.4M
Noom Coach for Bariatric SurgeryR44DK116370 · NIDDK · NOOM, INC. · PI HILDEBRANDT, THOMAS B, MICHAELIDES, ANDREAS · 2017 to 2019
$1.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR004419NIDDK NIH HHS R44 DK116370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies in clinical and non-clinical populations indicate differences between rationally and empirically derived subscales for the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), including samples of patients seeking bariatric surgery. This study aimed to use exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) to estimate the factor structure of the EDE-Q and assess for the additive value of alternative measurement of eating disorder symptoms. Adolescents and adults completed the EDE-Q and a psychiatric evaluation prior to bariatric surgery. Data from 330 participants were analysed using the original four-factor and modified three-factor structure of the EDE-Q using both confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM). Age, ethnicity, and body mass index were examined as covariates in the best fitting model, and model subscales used to generate a predictive model of clinician screened DSM-5 eating disorder diagnoses for criterion validity. A CFA of the four-factor EDE-Q provided poor model fit for a pre-surgical bariatric population, but the three-factor EDE-Q and an ESEM of the four-factor EDE-Q provided excellent model fit. The Eating Concern subscale of the four-factor ESEM model significantly predicted eating disorder diagnosis and was positively correlated with age. Our results suggest the ESEM derived factors of the EDE-Q offered some improvements to the original empirically derived factor structure, as subscale scores based on the original items and cross-loading items yielded an adequate prediction of clinician diagnoses.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAdultHumansLatent Class AnalysisPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesbariatric surgeryeating disordereating disorder examination questionnaireexploratory structural equation modellingobesityscreening assessment

Identifiers

PMID37188327
PMCPMC10524968
OpenAlexW4376603519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.