Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37188252›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2023

Activated carbons with extremely high surface area produced from cones, bark and wood using the same procedure.

Gui Li, Artem Iakunkov, Nicolas Boulanger, Oana Andreea Lazar, Marius Enachescu, Alejandro Grimm, Alexandr V Talyzin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gui LiDepartment of Physics, Umeå University Umeå SE-90187 Sweden alexandr.talyzin@umu.se.
Artem IakunkovDepartment of Physics, Umeå University Umeå SE-90187 Sweden alexandr.talyzin@umu.se.
Nicolas BoulangerDepartment of Physics, Umeå University Umeå SE-90187 Sweden alexandr.talyzin@umu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3881-6764
Oana Andreea LazarCenter for Surface Science and Nanotechnology, University Politehnica of Bucharest Splaiul Independentei 313 Bucharest 060032 Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-6729
Marius EnachescuCenter for Surface Science and Nanotechnology, University Politehnica of Bucharest Splaiul Independentei 313 Bucharest 060032 Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-8231
Alejandro GrimmDepartment of Forest Biomaterials and Technology, Biomass Technology Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Umeå SE-901 83 Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8502-8069
Alexandr V TalyzinDepartment of Physics, Umeå University Umeå SE-90187 Sweden alexandr.talyzin@umu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-8487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Activated carbons have been previously produced from a huge variety of biomaterials often reporting advantages of using certain precursors. Here we used pine cones, spruce cones, larch cones and a pine bark/wood chip mixture to produce activated carbons in order to verify the influence of the precursor on properties of the final materials. The biochars were converted into activated carbons with extremely high BET surface area up to ∼3500 m

Identifiers

PMID37188252
PMCPMC10177221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.