ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
The efficacy of dermoscopy in defining the surgical margins of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dermoscopy of Keratinizing Skin Tumors: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Keratoacanthoma, and Bowen's Disease.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Review
- Clinical Versus Dermoscopic Evaluation of Tumor Margins Prior to Surgical Excision-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of dermoscopy in defining the tumor margin of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) for the appropriate surgical margin. Methods: A total of 90 cSCC patients were enrolled in the study. All patients were recruited into two groups: those who preserved intact macroscopic features of neoplasms without or after incisional biopsy and those with uncertain residual tumors after excisional biopsy. A dermoscopy-defined surgical margin of 8mm outward was used according to the tumor boundaries observed with the naked eye and dermoscopy. All excised tumor specimens were divided into serial sections according to the four "3, 6, 9, 12" directions at every 4-mm interval from the dermoscopy-detected tumor margin. Pathological examination was performed at 0 mm, 4 mm, and 8 mm margins to confirm tumor remnants. Results: Retrospective analysis of dermatoscopic results showed inconsistent clinical and dermatoscopic borders in 43 of 90 cases (47.8%). The ability of dermoscopy to detect tumor borders showed no statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In the unbiopsy or incisional biopsy group, 66.6% of the tumors were resected with a 4-mm margin and 98.3% with an 8-mm margin, with significant differences (p = 0.047). For patients with inconspicuous clinical evidence of residual tumor after excisional biopsy, the tumor clearance rate was 53.3% at 0 mm, 93.3% at 4 mm, and 100.0% at 8 mm. Statistically significant differences were noted between 0 mm and 4 mm (p = 0.017), as well as between 0 mm and 8 mm (p = 0.043) but did not differ between 4 mm and 8 mm (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Dermoscopy defined the tumor margin of cSCC better than visual inspection alone. Direct dermoscopic-guided surgery with at least 8-mm expansion was recommended for high-risk cSCC. Dermoscopy also assisted in identifying surgical margins at the healing biopsy site, making 8 mm still the recommended expansion range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.