ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Comprehensive clinical evaluation of deep learning-based auto-segmentation for radiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world clinical impact of implementing and updating a deep learning-based automatic contouring system in rectal cancer radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- A prospective development and evaluation of a 2D convolutional neural network-based auto-segmentation model for cervical cancer radiotherapy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- A lightweight deep learning model for automated segmentation of Gynecologic organs and cervical Tumors on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Do AI-based contouring algorithms influence physicians in the online adaptive radiotherapy of patients with bladder cancer?Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and transforming cancer care.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Segmentation for pelvic malignancies in radiation oncology practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Assessing Quantitative Performance and Expert Review of Multiple Deep Learning-Based Frameworks for Computed Tomography-based Abdominal Organ Auto-Segmentation.Intelligent oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Potential Impact on Resident Physician Education in Radiation Oncology.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- A deep learning-based 3D Prompt-nnUnet model for automatic segmentation in brachytherapy of postoperative endometrial carcinoma.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- A quantitative analysis of artificial intelligence research in cervical cancer: a bibliometric approach utilizing CiteSpace and VOSviewer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Clinical Implementation and Evaluation of Auto-Segmentation Tools for Multi-Site Contouring in Radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Feasibility of artificial intelligence-driven interfractional monitoring of organ changes by mega-voltage computed tomography in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.Radiation oncology journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Deep learning-based models have been actively investigated for various aspects of radiotherapy. However, for cervical cancer, only a few studies dealing with the auto-segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) and clinical target volumes (CTVs) exist. This study aimed to train a deep learning-based auto-segmentation model for OAR/CTVs for patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy and to evaluate the model's feasibility and efficacy with not only geometric indices but also comprehensive clinical evaluation. Materials and methods: A total of 180 abdominopelvic computed tomography images were included (training set, 165; validation set, 15). Geometric indices such as the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD) were analyzed. A Turing test was performed and physicians from other institutions were asked to delineate contours with and without using auto-segmented contours to assess inter-physician heterogeneity and contouring time. Results: The correlation between the manual and auto-segmented contours was acceptable for the anorectum, bladder, spinal cord, cauda equina, right and left femoral heads, bowel bag, uterocervix, liver, and left and right kidneys (DSC greater than 0.80). The stomach and duodenum showed DSCs of 0.67 and 0.73, respectively. CTVs showed DSCs between 0.75 and 0.80. Turing test results were favorable for most OARs and CTVs. No auto-segmented contours had large, obvious errors. The median overall satisfaction score of the participating physicians was 7 out of 10. Auto-segmentation reduced heterogeneity and shortened contouring time by 30 min among radiation oncologists from different institutions. Most participants favored the auto-contouring system. Conclusion: The proposed deep learning-based auto-segmentation model may be an efficient tool for patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Although the current model may not completely replace humans, it can serve as a useful and efficient tool in real-world clinics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.