ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2023
The impact of daylight and window views on length of stay among patients with heart disease: A retrospective study in a cardiac intensive care unit.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Designing hospitality for health: an emerging approach to public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Minimum requirements for the design of Brazilian intensive care units: is it time for a change?Critical care science · 2026Review
- The Impact of Dynamic Lighting on Sleep Timing and Duration for Hospitalised Patients.Journal of sleep research · 2025Article
- Impact of natural views on mental health during COVID-19 quarantine: A natural experiment.Journal of environmental psychology · 2024Article
- A systematic literature review: building window's influence on indoor circadian health.Renewable & sustainable energy reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. The length of stay (LOS) is a well-established parameter used to evaluate health outcomes among critically ill patients with heart disease in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs). While evidence suggests that the presence of daylight and window views can positively influence patients' LOS, no studies to date have differentiated the impact of daylight from window views on heart disease patients. Also, existing research studies on the impact of daylight and window views have failed to account for key clinical and demographic variables that can impact the benefit of such interventions in CICUs. Methods: This retrospective study investigated the impact of access to daylight Results: Ultimately, 2319 patients were finally included in the study analysis. Findings indicated that patients receiving mechanical ventilation in rooms with access to daylight and window views had shorter LOS durations (16.8 h) than those in windowless rooms. Sensitivity analysis for a subset of patients with LOS ≤3 days revealed that parallel bed placement to the windows and providing access to both daylight and window views significantly reduced their LOS compared to windowless rooms in the unit ( Conclusions: Findings from this study could help architects make design decisions and determine optimal CICU room layouts. Identifying the patients who benefit most from direct access to daylight and window views may also help CICU stakeholders with patient assignments and hospital training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.