ArticleEplasty2023
A Comparative Analysis of Online Reporting of Possible Complications for Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures.
Article in Eplasty, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigation of Appearance Anxiety Levels and Influencing Factors in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Facial Cosmetic Procedures.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rise in Botox, fillers, and chemical peel procedures demands transparent online information that discloses all relevant risks and complications. This study assesses the quality of complication disclosure on the most popular cosmetic sites. Methods: The top 50 Google search results for "Botox," "fillers," and "chemical peel" were analyzed for their reporting on relevant complications. Websites were categorized based on their origin. An overall complication, prevention, management, prevalence, and disclaimer score were assigned to each site. Results: A total of 136 websites were analyzed. Of these websites, 31 (22.7%) did not mention any complications or risks associated with the treatment. The most commonly reported complications were bruising (67.0%) for Botox, swelling (79.0%) for fillers, and redness (58%) for chemical peels. The least-reported serious complications were toxin spread effects (31.0%) for Botox, vision loss (23.0%) for fillers, and allergic reaction for chemical peel (18.0%). Reports of serious and rare side effects were significantly lower than those of common side effects (Botox, Conclusions: The reporting of online complications for the top 3 cosmetic procedures performed in the US is highly variable, biased, and at times, completely absent. Patients pursuing cosmetic surgery are heavily influenced by the internet and vulnerable to misinformation. Cosmetic procedure websites are in need of drastic improvement to ensure the health and safety of all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37187869PMC10176491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.