Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37187807›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Late Hemorrhage Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Rajeev Sinha, Arun Gupta

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rajeev SinhaDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, India. (Dr. Sinha).
Arun GuptaDepartment of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, MLB Medical College, Jhansi, India. (Dr. Sinha).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Excruciating generalized abdominal pain with features suggestive of shock, at the end of the first or early second week after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), is a frightening and formidable diagnostic predicament. This is because the early known complications like biliary leak or vascular injuries are unlikely diagnoses. Hemoperitoneum, is not usually considered, but instead more common occurrences like acute pancreatitis, choledocholithiasis, and sepsis are suspected. A delay in diagnosis and subsequent management of hemoperitoneum could have disastrous consequences. Case Studies: Two patients presented with hemoperitoneum, in the second week after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The first was because of a leak from a pseudoaneurysm of the right hepatic artery and the other was a bleed from a subcapsular liver hemangioma as a part of Osler Weber Rendu syndrome. Initially, a clinical assessment in both the patients was diagnostically inconclusive. Ultimately the diagnosis could be made, based on computed tomography angiography and visceral angiography. In the second patient, a positive family history and genetic testing were helpful. The first patient was successfully managed by intravascular embolization, while the second patient was successfully managed conservatively with intraperitoneal drains and conservative management of comorbidities. Conclusions: The presentation is to generate awareness that hemorrhage could be a presentation, in the early second week, after LC. A common cause to be considered is a pseudo aneurysmal bleed. Secondary hemorrhage and other rare coincidental unassociated conditions could also be responsible for the hemorrhage. A high index of suspicion, and early and timely management are keys to a successful outcome.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicEmbolization, TherapeuticPancreatitisAcute DiseaseHemoperitoneumHumansAngioembolizationHemoperitoneumHepatic artery pseudoaneurysmLaparoscopic cholecystectomy complicationOsler Weber Rendu syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37187807
PMCPMC10178626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.